posted Thu, 03/21/2013 - 04:37
2039
Feedback and reviews
ad
Why is it when I ever leave a review, it gets deleted?
I follow the rules to the letter but if I review certain websites they get deleted immediately!
Can someone also explain why some websites have been removed from the sources list even thought they are not scammers?
I was under the impression that eroids was impartial, however, it does not seem like it at the moment!
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
Review gets delete if it doesn't comply to rules.
Which websites you think have been removed, specifically?
I found them, they have gone back to zero score and are pages down the list however they are still going strong which is why I don't really agree with the system you have, don't get me wrong I understand that people like to know whats going on now with sources so they know who they can trust, but it's not so good for the sources who are legit and still going strong but have been reset to a score of zero just because people haven't reviewed them, not everyone wants to leave reviews and not everyone knows about eroids, so they get stuck at the bottom of the pile even though they're good to go
Maybe your answer lies in one of these threads: http://www.eroids.com/forum/eroids.com/logs
sounds like you care about the source. I care about losing my money buying from sources. Pretty sure eroids is here to prevent the consumer from getting screwed. I am sure not much thought was put in to how to help a source look good or sell more.
it's got nothing to do with a specific source, it's to do with what is and is not a fair situation for ANY good source.
I have purposefully left the names of the sources out to avoid any sort of favoritism.
I just think that if a review board is going to review something then that something should be reviewed fairly and without prejudice.
There are a lot of sources marked at zero despite having been up on the first couple of pages recently and having high scores, I'm not saying they are all still in business, maybe some of them are not but the ones who are still in business are being penalized just because they don't have recent reviews.
The problem here is that you end up pushing good sources to the bottom of the pile because they don't get as many reviews as the top sites, just out of curiosity what would happen if the top sources stopped getting reviews, They would then be pushed to the bottom of the pile so where you you go then? You would be back at square one wondering if you're going to lose your money or not!
I understand all I am saying is I could give a shit less about a source. I care about saving my money from the scamming bastards. The sales from a website and a review on eroids is the sources problem. I am sure its a source that is not on here. As in they do not have representation on here. A site that is not trying to get reviews from eroids. Might not even know about eroids. So they could careless about their position in eroids. They could be promoting there site on a src page that would generate reviews ,they could even have a review at Eroids tag on their website,they could run a promotion and give out several hundred dollors worth of free gear to me. 3 things Eroids does to help Sources. If they do not use the tools oh well.Why would the top sources stop getting reviews? Because they suck and then who wants to buy from them.
To everyone that hasnt read it. http://www.eroids.com/news/new-voting
I am going to add you as a friend pm me and that way we can talk about a source. I am sure I can figure your problem out.
have you made orders from these web sites you want to review? and they have been removed because they do no subscribe anymore to the web site is my guess!!!
Yes I have made orders, I was under the impression that subscribing was not mandatory, isn't it up to the source whether they subscribe or not, I'm not entirely sure why they should subscribe anyway as this is supposed to be a review site.
The subscription just enables sources to interact with members, if they don't subscribe then they don't interact so why remove them? I doesn't make sense, sites don't ask to come on eroids they are here because members have asked questions about them or want to give their experiences.
I find it odd that I cannot review a site on a review forum!
humm.. then I am not really sure... let me know what you come up with!!
I'm also wondering why some of the websites have gone from a score of 85+ to zero!!
I think that is a part of the new rating system... they have trending sites now, which would be sites giving promos and a lot of reviews come in at once... they have a stable sites which I believe is the whole years calculated reviews.. and there are a few more things that are involved..
Yes that seems to be it
I was pointed towards the way the new system works, thanks for that
But I still really understand why sources need to subscribe or why some have been set back to zero even though they have had reviews in the last couple of months
Because sources go bad fast. If the system rates a higher priority for current votes then there is a better chance when a source goes bad it will be caught and save us money. Its nice to know what happened 2 years ago so you can see that a source has been holding things together that long but the current quality is really the important thing.
AnonCurious about this also.