posted Fri, 07/24/2026 - 11:49
315
Para Pharma oil coloring discrepancy
ad
Hey all,
I notched some oil color discrepancy with Para Pharma. I’ve been using their oils now for a few years, everything tests amazing, no complaints etc.
This is the first time I’ve noticed different current batches having different oil coloring? So both mast and primo one batch is slightly yellow vs a crystal clear.
Anyone have info as to why this might be? Not calling anything “wrong” I’m just curious. Could they be made in different facilities and or different carriers? I’m pretty sure para claims everything is mig812.
Btw- all batches tested either on the dot or above listed mg, so the coloring is in question, not the quality what so ever.
Ordered from:
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
Blast away dude. This gear is legit af. Love para gear.
Heat can make the oil change and so can the raws. The only one who really knows is the lab but I will say I have never seen anything bunk from this lab. I tested their SUS myself and it was good. Others tested the Mast E and it was good also.
Thanks for input guys!
Heat variation. Rams color variation. Different brewed items by batch. It's gtg
Ya I’ve been pinning both color variants both hit the same
Def new brew they just had some old stickers left over
Batch is arbitrary don’t put any weight on that. That’s different brews for sure
So yeah they are different brews, different batch number also but both made in the same time period I’ve seen so I’m just not sure. My old primo is crystal clear and new primo slightly yellow. My old mast slightly yellow and new mast crystal clear.
Testo e 250 all more yellow which has been across the board.
I think I’m just trying to figure out why the color changes on the same products that both were being dropped at the same time.
Could be the oil they used for each brew or the APIs. Some APIs right now are tinting the finished oils
Pure speculation: I wonder if batch # may refer to the batch of r@ws it came from. Then there could be multiple brews from a certain “batch”. Just a guess.
Or they just buy 2,000 pre printed bottles and use over 20 batches till it runs out and then use the next 2,000 bottles and "batch numbers" are just to make it look like its pharmacy instead of UGL ghetto bottles
Unfortunately this is a reason for a decent amount of unsurity when it comes to testing. Test results with the same batch # doesn’t a sure them to be the same potency.
The most likely and logical answer for sure! I just realized his post states they are different batch #’s so my original post is irrelevant anyways :( thought I was being all big brained n shit.
Damn I never thought of that some good critical thinking right there bud. Would make sense of doseage discrepancies as well but also if that was the case I would think they would supply testing for that raw batch to suppliers
Good thinking. Possibility.. they probably brew up thousands of vials per “batch”, that would be a fairly large vessel to brew all in one go. Would make sense it’s done in a few brews. Gma didn’t bake the whole batch of cookies at once, so why would Para? Haha
I noticed the same thing with their test c 250. Same batch number. One was clear, the other was slightly yellow, and the font on the "testo c 250" was different. I think the product is fine, but I did think that was a bit odd.