+ 34 GODTROPIN / PURETROPIN
GODTROPIN 12IU VIAL (Batch No. 010415)
15IUs
3.9% RELATED PROTEINS
0.7% DIMMER AND RELATED SUBSTANCES
PURETROPIN 10IU VIAL
BUNK
GODTROPIN 12IU VIAL FROM Juicyj23 (welts)
53.1IUs
1.7% RELATED PROTEINS
0.2% RELATED SUBSTANCES
GODTROPIN 12IU VIAL FROM Juicyj23 (welts)
57.8IUs
4.7% RELATED PROTEINS
0.1% RELATED SUBSTANCES
Link to Juicyj23:
https://www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-hgh-infection
The European Pharmacopoeia (Pharmacopoeia Europaea, Ph. Eur.) is a pharmacopoeia that aims to provide common quality standards throughout Europe to control the quality of medicines and the substances used to manufacture them. It is a published collection of monographs that describe both the individual and general quality standards for ingredients, dosage forms and methods of analysis for medicines. These standards apply to medicines for both human and veterinary use.
RELATED PROTEINS
All of the non-hGH proteins coexist with the main ingredient (rhGH). Impurities influence the rhGH activity and cause side effects. The fewer impurities one product have, the better quality it has .
Testing method: HPLC (To assay the percentage of rhGH and the impure proteins in the product)
Standard: According to European Pharmacopoeia 5.0 (Page2463-2464), the content of related protein of somatropin should be no more than 6.0 %
Result:
DIMMER AND RELATED SUBSTANCES OF HIGHER MOLECULAR MASS TEST
Dimmer and related substances of higher molecular mass: rhGh aggregates that coexist with normal rhGh. They don't have biological activity and cause antibody of rhGH. The antibody combines to rhGH molecule. The antibody prevents the rhGH from combining to its receptor to stimulate growth, cause the biological activity of rhGH to decrease.
Testing method: HPLC (To assay the percentage of active protein and the impure proteins in the product) Standard: According to European Pharmacopoeia 5.0 (Page 2464), the content of dimer and related substances of higher molecular mass of somatropin should be no more than 4.0%
BACTERIA ENDOTOXINS TEST
BacteriaEndotoxins:
To assay the amount of bacteria endotoxins .
The More bacteria endotoxins present will increase the adverse and toxic effects of the rhGH.
Results:
According the specification of Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China (2000 Edition) and European Pharmacopoeia 5.0, the content of bacterial endotoxins should be no more than 5 EU.
ELISA - TEST OF E.COLI DERIVED PROTEIN
The more the host-cell-derived (E.coli) proteins present, the more toxic and adverse effects there will be caused.
- Bookmark
- 34
- 0
I couldn't believe it either...I was shocked PureT was bunk.
So many technical terms in this thread....except for the word "bunk"...makes it easier to understand the quality comparably lol...just sucks ass for those whom bought the bunk!!
I can think of several that really gave the guy a hard time that should be apologizing. This was probably the best deal on GH Eroids ever saw
I know, I didn't even go that hard on him (Half stuck up for him and half gave it to him a little for the welts) and I shot him a thanks/sorry PM.
def was is there still any around is what i want to know
+1 ... These results are nuts! I took the other post with a grain of salt since the source posted ... holy hell what were they thinking!
It's been so long since we sent these in...I forgot the drama behind it all. This is from a kit back before the packaging was changed to 240. So JuicyJ posted about the welt issue Nov of last year. I didn't know Matt had sent in a vial for testing back then also.
So Matt sent a vial from the same "batch" or "run"
It's gotta be just a small amount of kits like this....testing kits maybe?
I really thought the results would show an issue with the GH. Since Matts results are the same on a completey different test...the results must be accurate.....which is even more crazy, right? LOL
The SIMEC results are similar to the U.S. Proteomics lab results...legit GH.....just a lot of it in one lil vial O_0
And yes....you are right....no magical pep mix......
And even in my experience, no gh has ever had my hands feeling damn near crippled at times like godtropin did. I was doing the equivalent of 18iu per day it appears...
shits crazy man
damn that's s lot of gh in that vial.
Scary stuff! +1 thanks for everything!
So, 53iu in a vial labeled at 12iu? Compensating for a little inconsistency is one thing but putting out a super potent product not to mention falsely labeled product in hopes that when tested will result in higher IGF levels which then will result in more hype and potential customers is completely different. What ever happened to getting what you paid for? What ever happened to quality and CONSISTENCY control? Am I the only one who thinks this is reckless and dangerous?
I assume that the red welts is a result of injecting 10-20ius in a single shot. IDK......just my .02 but this is dangerous to put out a product over dosed to this extent with no regards to safety for the customer.
Completely agree. I want what's on the label.
rocketballzNo. See the many comments below. Totally agree. Ramping up the IU's per bottle to give false gh and igf numbers. I bet Matt wasn't expecting it to be THAT overdosed.
I'll give you a +1 if you inject the whole bottle for a serum test lol
rocketballzI would need at least a +10 LOL
labeled at 24iu and he had said they were overdosed at 27iu.
"He had said they were over dosed at 27."
So not even the source truly knows what is in them?
+1
Thank you
Already thanked you a bunch, but thanks brotha
rocketballzThanks for posting these dude. I'll stick with my nords and somastims thank you very much :). Too many moving parts here and too many unknown variables. At least with pharma I know what I got. These 4x overdosed kits should be showing gh serum and igf levels that are through the roof and yet the opposite appears to be the case. Chinese mindfuck!!
This is a continuous mind fuck. I'm still running my 12iu gt kits and I'm down to like 120 vials or so and I thought I was running 8-12 iu a day. Sometimes I get welts if I pin too close to the belly button, most of the time not though. I destroyed the packaging but I know I have kits from two different lot numbers. I surely hope they're not 50+ iu vials and cause me to grow enlarged organs... Will run igf asap , thanks for testing once again hail
I dunno either brutha
They can't all be dosed like this.
I think the reaction was bad enough that JuicyJ didn't run an entire kit (2ius am / 2ius pm)
This was 2 Vials from the same kit
Vials/Box labeled as 12IU/120iu
Sold as 24iu vial/ 240iu kit
If I remember right, those were the first 24iu (double dosed) kits before he got the packaging made for GT240. Later to be known as batch 230915
So 230915.... What the fuck is the deal with that ?
I have a box of that... Does that mean there is 50+iu per vial? I'm confused
Bloody hell eh? Good thing I've stuck to low dose (maybe). Great post by HR +1
Agreed. But I agree with HR that they can't all be like that. I've been running 3iu a day (just got up to 3 like 2 or 3 weeks ago), and my IGF came in range for the dosing I was running (not for my dose x2.3), so thinking (hoping) I've been accurate(ish)ly dosed so far. Lol
Yeah, true. I think there must have been an error along the way with some vials dosed double, twice. People make mistakes. I understand those affected may be unhappy with it though obviously. Matt hasn't strung us along and has posted the results as he had them. I don't think anyone would believe they've sent out an entire batch at 2.3 times the product yield. I started with 4iu as that's how I dosed pharma some 10 years ago and had the same effects. Only difference being I ramped to 6iu back then without having as much 'frozen hand' issues, had to drop back to 5iu on this stuff. I think your results are what I'd expect if you take into account 6 day on, 1 off protocol. Certainly not terrible. I would love to know why there aren't some low igf levels but then I think it's fair to assume that people are more likely to get tests done if they suspect an issue, and more likely to report them than if they were happy.
Couldn't agree more with everything you just said on all fronts
Thanks for posting!!!! +2
What batch # gave juicy the welts ?
230915 gave me welts
shiningstarThank you hailrazor!! your knowledge and testing has, and still does, continue to help me and every member here!
Damn... Glad I just got rid of the puretropin!! No gh in it ?!
Gotta check the batch # on the god when I get home and see wtf is up
Wow 56iu, so the dimmer badshit in the gh affects bio availability? It came real close the tolerance allowed and you know it goes over on a few batches, so in essence it's growth but you're not growing?
Thanks bro, Really appreciate the testing.
Thanks HailRazor.
I don't see any mention of the mg/iu content. How does that get factored in here as I've seen you post about other products being underdosed on a mg/iu basis. Thanks bro
It states: (ex,)
ASSAY 15IUs
ASSAY 56IUs / Vial
(These reports didn't provide milligram..some past reports have)
The king of testing strikes again!
Thanks HR! I'm always interested in your posts. A real asset to members here (don't let it go to you head though)! Lol.
+2
Hitman187thanks for testing hail, you da man! whats your opinion on why these vials dosed 57.8iu, nearly 3x the advertised amount showing subpar igf scores? you would think since its legit somatropin dosed 3x as strong it would be a great value to buy but the igf have been pretty low from what you'd normally expect.
Man Hit, I really don't know.
I can only suggest maybe reading up on Bacteria Endoxins in regards to Recombinant Human Growth Hormone, BioSimilars. Maybe an Immune Response possibly.
You'd have to ask Matt about which kits may/may not be dosed this way. There's no way they can all be like that. It's gotta be some kinda hiccup to say the least.
I've mentioned this in one of my comments. On 4iu's on the 230915 batch, I gained 6-8 lbs in the first 2 weeks. I went off when I posted my results about 2 weeks ago. I've seen a lot of that water weight drop off since then. I was expecting a good IGF reading. It's really confounding to me all the factors that could be involved here.
So let me ask you this. IF I went back on at say 8iu's per day, and say the biological activity is hindered for whatever reason it may have been hindered in my last test, does that suggest I'd get little benefit from the HGH even at a higher dosage? :-/
I'm not saying that your low IGF1 is an immune response....many factors could cause it....but....this is some info on immune responses to therapeutic proteins
https://www.eroids.com/sites/default/files/gearpic/21800/image_176.jpg
You the man hail. What undo for the community is incredible brother. Not being an ass kicker but just wanted to let you know it's appreciated. Wish I would have got some of those 54iu vials. Hell, I would have bought all of them. Haha
ArmedThat's awesome lol
Awww Yea! That's TITz bro....luv it
Somastim4life