Ok pale you have my attention. And I've been thinking about this for a while. I've been a part of a few promos in the past few months and haven't had an oppurtunity to reveiw properly.

I have since decided that I would not participate in any freebie promos unless I could review in a timely manner.

I was contacted by this source and they asked for a review. They were preparing to ship out all the second vials on this promo. All I needed to do was review and vote. I said sorry haven't had a chance to use it so I guess I'm out.

I'm not going to stand here on a soap box and preach that I'm awesome and I did the right thing. I dis not do the right thing. The right thing would've been to let someone that was ready to run it, and review it and vote get the oppurtunity to use it.

All of this fanboy/ Schill talk has got me thinking.

That is all. Thanks

That's fair enough with not reviewing for friends anymore (that should be in the rules for everyone). My issue with that review is how he stated that HE ran the gear and HIS results/experience was great, not a friend. Why not say you gave the gear to a friend and leave a review like the others? Why blatantly leave a fake review? Not for nothing but when I'm contemplating using a new source the first thing I do is look at reviews and see if they're legit or not and research the person leaving a review. Should I hold reviews like this against the source and not order? You're the boss but I hope you see where I'm coming from and think of new members that join a review site to help guide their decisions (after reading legit reviews). Be safe and stay healthy Pale