I'm running 10mg a day right now of gw everyday. I'm on a heavy tren and winstrol cycle and I'm taking it in hopes of helping my cholesterol stay in better shape. I'll get blood work done soon and I'll see if it really does help with the cholesterol as much as its claimed to!

So Glasko Smith Kline completely dropped the testing on this peptide completely due the cancer in the test subjects.

Just a couple sentences in the wikipedia description of the stuff is enough to make me wonder;

why would you use this stuff?

I'll keep looking into it, but the little I've read is all negative.

"The encouraging results from the Phase 2 clinical trials with GW501516 have been shadowed by the preclinical toxicology findings. There are several conflicting studies showing the direct effects of oral dosing rats and mice of GW501516 leading to either the induction or in- hibition of carcinoma (Table 3). Looking closely at the experimental de- sign it seems that there is a direct correlation between dose and outcome, with doses of GW501516 10 mg/kg/day for 6 weeks inducing detrimental side effects such as rectal bleeding in mice (Gupta et al., 2004) and at 10 to 100 mg/kg/day for 104 weeks in rats and mice devel- oping tumours throughout the body (Geiger et al., 2009; Newsholme et al., 2009) and 30 to 275 mg/kg leading to placental malformation in rats (Nishimura et al., 2013). In these animals, this high dosing would lead to agonists reaching the μM range, and therefore the non- genomic and off target effects of PPARβ/δ agonists become apparent. On the other hand, similar or lower doses of GW501516 (2 to 10 mg/ kg for 5 weeks) lead to the inhibition of chemically induced carcinomas in mice when dosed for up to 22 weeks (Marin et al., 2006; Hollingshead et al., 200, and inhibit growth of human cancer cell lines (Bility et al., 200. Mice orally dosed with 4 mg/kg/day become more metabolically active (Lee et al., 2006); at 2 mg/kg/day mice, re- cover from chemically induced non-alcoholic steatosis (Nagasawa et al., 2006) and ApoE−/− mice exhibit significantly reduced lesions (Barish et al., 200)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/24184294/

So, to simply put it, with large doses caused cancer development but with low doses caused decreased cancer development and increased metabolism and endurance. you need to notice that they were dosing upwards of 100mg per "KG"! A rat does not weigh much, at all. There have been numerous studies that 10-20mg ED for humans (hypothetically, of course) has done exactly this. Those who abuse (any substance honestly) will see the harsh negatives, such as cancer. Do some more research, there is a ridiculous amount out there for this substance and "lab test" responsibly!