ashop's picture
ashop
  • 891
  • SRC
3265

+ 5 METHODS OF TESTING STEROIDS ( INTERNATIONALLY ACCEPTED )

ad

Here are the methods for testing steroids for your informations guys. Those are scans from pharmacopeeia . Examples for two products but if anyone is interested by a particular method can email me to send him MOA .

The most frequent pharmacopeic method of raw material and product dosage is the HPLC. The mass spectrophotometria is rarely used for quantitative determination.
On the other hand the mass spectophotometria is frequently used as a method of identifying unknown substances and not for quantitative determinations. MS is used for criminalistic laboratories where is important to see which substance is there and not HOW MUCH and for research laboratories or universityes where quantitative determination is not important.
Sure you can use a MS in same way like a HPLC but then analyses should be strictly guided by reference standards and method validation, in order to use the mass spectrophotometria method.

I think is smart for you members to be more as informed as possible about testing methods for steroids. This would prevent people to manipulate you by presenting bad or fabricated methods.

Ordered from: 
euroking's picture

So mass spec is only to show what is inside and not the purity? alin?

ashop's picture

MS can be used in same way like HPLC but for quantitative determination he need a standard of reference for substance ( is usually provided by european pharmacopeea online shop ) and a reference standard for impurities. The way MS is used now show zero competence.

Also the conclusions for MS are nonsense. Like 50 mg concentration ( instead of label of 100 mg ) and 11% purity. Do you feel that this is nonsense ?

read here a reply from professor at this statement :
If your analysis says that the concentration of active substance is 50 mg per ml, then this is the number of the substance purity, because it should be compared to the pharmacopeic standard with concentration (purity) of 100 %. The concentration of impurities should be calculated separately, compared to pharmacopeic standards for each impurity. Thus, if you insist on a concentration of 50 mg per ml, this means that the purity is also 50 mg per ml.

read this carefully is not hard to understand and see the truth.

http://www.eroids.com/pics/stealth-trenbolone-acetate-hplc-tests-everyon...

euroking's picture

I dont doubt you at all if you think that

i also think the best way to test is by HPCL i allways told other sources that but the members here are going after mass spec and not by HPCL

ashop's picture

There are lots of laboratories in each big city of this world. Most of them would do analyses of what you want if you give them MOA. I can get MOA from professor you find a independent laboratory. Just expect for a analyse to be more expensive than 60$. For this price you can not have a good analyse on HPLC or MS. Probably 3-4 times more expensive.

YES HPLC is the way to go. This is why pharmacopeeia reccomend HPLC. On MS you will have problems to get results for how much is inside.

Brc0106's picture

@ashop are there any test to show the purity of balkan or sp labs? just wondering my past expierence with balkan was good thinking of making bp my primary brand of test

In a promo × 1
ashop's picture

Each batch of BP is tested by governmental agency. You can read this informations here I posted a good tutorial there http://www.eroids.com/discussions/lab/balkan-pharmaceuticals about HOW TO CHECK IF A MANUFACTURER is real. You can find lab tests on AMED website.
Also on our shop you can find lab tests uploaded for BP products.

From this week I decided to post HPLC tests each week here for SP products and STEALTH. Just come back at the end of week and look to my profile you will have a new lab test and so on each week.

PrezSHINRA's picture

Why is it they make so many if there pills look the same. I got proviron and winstrol from u and there identical. I made sure to seperate them but seems like poor planning. You have any idea why they haven't changed that.

ashop's picture

I dont understand. Please contact our support

Brc0106's picture

Thanks for getting back at me

In a promo × 1
dooduu2's picture

It's funny how everyone has such a shitty attitude towards any debate on the testing. The only ppl that should be debating are the one's with the education and experience to speak intelligently on such topics.

Problem is even when or if anyone could discredit the tests 99% of us wouldn't understand.

I love the testing it's great for the community, but don't follow blindly.

ashop's picture

Exactly ! Also more informed members become about this matter it will be more hard for others to manipulate you ( for their profits or for different interests) by presented fabricated tests and methods.

7gothic's picture

Best comment I've read this week.

showstoppa's picture

Are you insinuating these methods are the only way to test? If so, you are wrong.

ashop's picture

Is not the only way. It is possible same way with MS but using reference substances . So both machines can work in same way but the way MS is used here is no the right way. I am not a expert but if you guys have questions make a list and I can give a professor to answer them.

I dont claim I am educated to answer those questions.

Right now person who is doing the tests here doesnt have the skills to use this machine and is not doing in the correct way. Is not my conclusion read here

http://www.eroids.com/pics/stealth-trenbolone-acetate-hplc-tests

kth3446's picture

Don't engage that guy, he's one of those meso schitzophranic super trolls, and we don't neeed that stuff here. i don't know if your tren was bunk or not, I've got some bp from you that was probably thee best gear I've ran so i hope not. I do know there is a right and wrong way to debate a thing like this and an exchange of personal attacks won't help anyone but those of the lowest intellect make a decision.

In a promo × 1
showstoppa's picture

Yea fuck your professor. He is nothing but a paid shill. And you are exactly what you have been for years upon years.....a selective scammer.

Colossus_fit's picture

no words...put a stop to your tone, uncivilized!

ashop's picture

You brought a fallacious argument : Ad Hominem (Argument To The Man): attacking the person instead of attacking his argument . Your credibility is less than your karma

HydeMind's picture

LOL this response made my morning

stormuk69's picture

haha boom !! Spot on mate.