I'm absolutely with you XV and also just to add to your idea I think there should be more guidelines for writing reviews. I know there are the rules before posting a review that comes up but more detailed parameters to leaving reviews. Maybe even sub categories to the categories and like what was mentioned before, a minimum amount of words. No one word or even one sentence responses EXCEPT for communication SOMETIMES. This is just another idea and I don't mean to stray from your original post because i think its an idea worth putting thought into and I like it. I think a lot of us are tired of seeing "good to go" and "legit"...and especially reviews of people saying their EQ is good and saying they've been running it for two weeks. Really? U think an undecylenate ester is good after two weeks? And you're right when you say its not a bias against low karma brothers but a lot of them are just excited they got something in the mail and have put almost zero thought into the details of what they are running. I like your idea of maybe filtering a review by member level, etc. We both know it won't be easy for the site admins to change these things because it Will require programming changes and other things but I think the fact that you started this topic will get the ball rolling. It's all a part of the evolution of this brotherhood here.

@CJ I like the idea of a review score instead of applying point to your karma. Maybe even both. Let it still add to the karma but also have a review level or rating.

@scooby I feel you about the low karma reviews being important. It does help to POSSIBLY see selective scammers. I've seen sources where members with karma enough to vote and rate always get their packs but those with not enough are the ones that don't receive their shit.

SIDE NOTE: I'm not going to go and accuse any source of anything but if you search source reviews for a little while its funny how some source reviews ALWAYS have an upvote for absolutely no reason. One sentence on every review category yet every reviewer on your page has an update? Sketchy? A little bit! I'm not accusing sources of doing this but its just seems very suspicious that I see extremely detailed reviews on some source pages that have no upvotes at all but your source review page has an upvote on damn near if not EVERY review that it obviously subpar at best. Just sets my spider senses off a little that's all!