+ 17 Sciroxx Tren Mass Spec Results
So this sample is for Tren E that came from Sciroxx and was dosed at 200mg/ml. We found that dosing to be accurate if not slightly overdosed at 210mg/ml. Problem is all the garbage floating around in the sample. We found the sample to at 26% purity. On page 3 when you look at the ions there are lines and at the top of the lines are numbers. Those numbers are the molecular weight of target ions that were found in the range of 50 to 800, where most compounds that we're interested are found. The molecular weight for Tren E is 383 and we see that molecular weight is present to a certain degree but what stands out in my my mind is there is another unknown molecular weight that is MORE present than the Test E! Whatever it is has a molecular weight of 515, and then there are other IONS present as well that are unknown. We don't test for the unknow IONS so all we can say is they're unknown. Once all the IONS are counted and then divided into the Tren E we come up with 26% purity. Just a dirty sample. And for the record, this was a sealed sample.
When faced with these kinds of results the source ALWAYS blames the testing or the methodology, which is why our methodology has to be perfect every time without fail There are many safegaurds in place to prevent false readings and to keep the eroids community informed while keeping sources honest. I hope this helps.
- Bookmark
- 17
- 0






I wonder where the results came from ?
so where from u got the gear ?
I'll try to be patient, as non of the members below has any notion in analytical chemistry nor you ....
Like in any HPLC test you rely on a standard - you compare the standard to the product u got . The standrd is a high purity fried powder, while the product is a powder which is dissolved in oil and other solvents and went through a process which creates some by products.
Fact 1 - you found there 210mg tren enanthate - pure tren enanthate - like u should. Again - tehre are 210mg tren enathate in the oily solution period
Fact 2 - there are some minor impurities there as there should be - if your standard would be an oily solution of benzyl benzoate, benzyl alcohol, oil and tren which went through 80c dissolving process you would and you should see these !
Fact 3 - the impurities which somehow dazzled u can't of course be 74 percent, and I'm even ashamed to explain this as the members here are not that idiots like u expect them to be - if there are 210mg/ml of trenE in the oily solution it means that the 74 percent you refer to are simply the rest of the excipients there FFS - it means that 597mg is a bizarre shit - well this is responsible to the oil weight and other solvents weight - isn't it clear ?!
angusUhhhh....really? Clear as mud. Thank you.
This conversation is over. You can't be civil and have an adult conversation about it then fuck off. The results stand.
I would like to contact now this "lab" - I would appreciate to get the details to my mail. So I may clearly discuss the analysis of these results with the analytical chemist there !
I urge you to post the results for the methanodex as you posted them to me as well - or are you here for the free gear :? should I quote here you mailed to me? or you're a man to admit you possibly made a mistake in the analysis of these results ???!
angusFree gear? I've never contacted you. I'm not the person that supplied the sample, I'm the one that ran the test. So you see, I have no interest in this. You put out a product, the user asked me to test it and post the results, I have done that. No mistake was made in the analysis, Mass Specs don't lie. Sources ALWAYS blame the 1/4 million dollar machine, or those of us that ran it. God forbid it's bad gear. That couldn't possibly be the case, could it karl? Everything you have ever put out is perfect is it?
Oh and it seems to me that your dbol was around 50% purity and dosed at 10mg. Do you really want me to post that too? Are you proud of that? Why are you so insistent that I post it? Regardless I can only post one pic per day so I'll post if for you tomorrow. I consider it neither good nor bad. It is just average in my mind.
I want to know now the lab who pretend to make these test - I'm quite positive that some one who want to blackmail me gave them to you, you have no clue how to analyze these results - shame on u
I do wonder what interest drive the one behind this "test"
angusYou sources that provide poor quality gear always say the same thing.
I'm still curious - someone did contacted me in advance about this test - I may show his mail to me - and asked for free gear to sample again and get right results ...........
MAy you PM me and tell me who is the source for the sample ?
beyondimportsYuck
Rustyhooker26% ????!!! Wow.....
Old News !
angusI always love your two word posts, it's like your calling card: red two words. Now can you break it down for all the boys and girls that want to know why you say that?
Ive been around for awhile ? "This time" it's because I've never ordered from there for a reason ! But now you all No why now ? ;-)
One product you're currently using is pure garbage ;)
Been waiting on this.First sciroxx i seen done.+1
Id really like to see the hexadex get done.
angusThere's more in the queue.
AnonDayuuuuuuum!!!!! There's another cat who got some bad news too. Would u say this is a pattern bro? Did u get a test on his Tren ace? I ran his ace and it seemed like some good Tren. Mass Spec don't lie brother. Thanks for posting this.
Give them a vote if you find it helpful.PermalinkangusNo I don't think it's a pattern, we test all kinds of things. Once in a while there's a bad one. The unfortunate thing is most bad ones never get posted cause a deal is made behind the scenes to make it go away. Bravo for the guys that have enough balls to post these and not take the replacement.
AnonUr a boss!
angusThanks hommie, missed your q earlier: no we haven't tested his tren Ace.