posted Fri, 02/24/2012 - 21:38
1460
cjc-1295 cylce on and off question
ad
i was researching but its late and i hope somone has a answer for me how long can i use cjc and whats the cycling on and off time is it like steroids or not.
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
There isn't a time frame for being off with it.taking it 5 days a week with the weekends off is enough time to desensitize.The longer your on the better the benefits.
tread-mNot like juice in that way, more like hgh in that we are talking polypeptides. No need for pct unless running test etc but I do suggest running test with your peps to maximize benefit. They will cause additional pulse in natty growth to some degree and that implies they effect axis balance which then implies test will maximize the peps. While you can run them much longer I would shoot for a 12 week run ramping slow week by week to saturation which is between 200 and 300 mcg's per half life period. Thats where it is important to know which cjc you have , one (with dac) has a much longer half life than the other version and will be used differetly. I would lean you towards 12 week runs with time off to maximize effect and the other reason is for myself and many others in my circle there is an irritating side effect that ramps up after several weeks. It is hard to describe but it is like heartburn without much burn and as you lay down at night that situation is worse and has a weird throat thing , again hard to explain. I did run them in a cycle and coupled with ghrp6 so that could be some addition to the side that may not be apparent with cjc alone or even cjc and test.
see i was planning on running cjc w/o dac since i heard with dac might cause gh bleed over time . also including ghrp 6 twice a day 100 mcg and im currently on a cycle of test p and anavar didnt know how long to run the cycle untill i read ur post i read in some areas you can run this specific pep combo indefinitly but that seemed to good to be true
tread-mWell you have to keep in mind, these are experimental and the history we need to fully understand products is just not there. Having said that you have to think of people such as Stallone who has ran hgh for nearly 3 decades and many Hollywood types who had access to it going way back and have used safely forever. Hgh is essentially the same thing just much longer strands. So what they have found and continue to expirement with and continue to try to find are certain length strands to do specific things.
The long term thinking is that these will cure disease such as alzheimers etc. Thats sort of the goal is the big cure for the big bucks. In the process or interim they have found these do many nice things even if the cure is not here yet. Think of them as drugs and negative in the wrong hands but also think vitamins may be bad in the wrong hands or ibuprofin if misused etc. Longer term use IMO is similar to that of hgh. Used properly for many years it could be very safe or abused it could be very unsafe. We do't have all those answers.
Its a simple experience it, see what you think and how they effect you personally, what are your sides etc. These will be much like many things such as var or winnie or primo etc, your bf will determine just how effective they can be. I was pretty lean when I had my best effect from them and they created a much tighter, leaner cut up look for me. Dial in diet and training and take a run and see how they work for you. I think any polypeptide works better if you slowly ramp it up. You prompt new things mor often with less plateau. So you start lower week one and slowly ramp a little each week to maybe achieve saturation early in the second bhalf of a 12 week run for example. To me your benefit would be greater in that way rather than starting at saturation and rolling the whole 12 weeks at that dose.
i second your reply..i find that starting at a lower dose no matter the compound gives you more time to evaluate the effects good and bad before they become to severe..