JuiceFreak's picture
JuiceFreak
  • 0
2865

White People are not Pure Breed humans Africans are

ad

this post is a bit weird for this website but i feel that this information is interesting and i think you guys would too

A draft sequence publication by the Neanderthal Genome Project in Sept 2013 indicates that Neanderthals share more genetic lineages with non-African populations. According to the study, this scenario is best explained by gene flow from Neanderthals to modern humans after humans emerged from Africa. An estimated 1—4% of the DNA in Europeans and Asians (e.g. French, Chinese and Papua probands) is non-modern and shared with ancient Neanderthal DNA rather than with Sub-Saharan Africans (e.g. Yoruba and San probands). Though less parsimonious than gene flow, ancient sub-structure in Africa, could account for the higher levels of Neanderthal lineages detected in Eurasians. Some researchers suggest admixture of 3.4%-7.9% in Eurasian populations, rejecting the hypothesis of ancestral population structure.
No evidence supporting this has been found in mitochondrial DNA analyses of modern Europeans, suggesting at least that no direct maternal line originating with Neanderthals has survived into modern times.

Variation in microcephalin, a critical regulator of brain size whose loss-of-function by damaging mutations may also cause primary microcephaly, was claimed to be the strongest evidence of admixture as of 2007. One type of the gene, known as D, has a high worldwide frequency (~70%), but a young coalescence age to its most recent common ancestor, ~37,000 years ago. The remaining types (non-D) coalesce to ~990,000 years ago, while the separation time between D and non-D is estimated at ~1,100,000 years ago. An evolutionary advantage of D is possible but controversial.
The distribution of the D allele, high outside Africa but low in sub-Saharan Africa (29%), has been suggested to indicate involvement of an archaic Eurasian population, and estimates of the divergence time between modern humans and Neanderthals based on mitochondrial DNA are in favor of the Neanderthal lineage as the most likely archaic Homo population from which introgression into the modern human gene pool took place. However, according to Svante Pääbo, ancient DNA from Croatian Neanderthal fossils found at Vindija shows that they carried the non-D allele of microcephalin, and there is no evidence for admixture or introgression.A study published in May 2010 found that a Neanderthal individual from Mezzena Rockshelter (Monti Lessini, Italy), possessed the ancestral version of D, rather than the derived version which is common among Eurasian populations. The study did not rule out interbreeding between Neanderthals and modern humans but indicated that the particular DNA sample provided no support to the theory that Neanderthals contributed the derived allele of D to modern humans.
Based on a 2001 study of the gene that results in red-headedness some commentators speculated that Neanderthals had red hair and that some red-headed and freckled humans today share some heritage with Neanderthals. A 2007 study analysing Neanderthal DNA found that some Neanderthals were red-haired, but the mutation to the MC1R gene which caused red hair in Neanderthals is not found in modern humans.
There is evidence that some immune related genes are of Neanderthal origin. HLA-C*0702, found in Neanderthals, is common in modern Europeans and Asians but never seen in Africans. It is thought that this immune gene may have been picked up by humans after leaving Africa to help deal with European diseases that the Neanderthals had evolved defenses for

stl's picture

A theory is not a fact. Its called evolution and in some cases even a mutation. This theory nor any of the rest can be proven so it is not the truth. Where did they find this perfect DNA strand? Do they really no how old it is, where it originated from? How do they now what they are using was not a mutation of who was alive at the time? It's all just a guess as all paleontologist do that guess, stating there own opinion without a written or recorded history it is all speculation if you want to think its a fact go ahead but I disagree. I still think the ape theory is bullshit and also cannot be proven. Is the house cat a evolved saber cat? At least it would still be a cat evolving into a cat. Maybe the hominids where just another race completely, That we killed off like many other species of animal, that could be another of countless theory's. They cant prove we all started in Africa although that does make the most sense in a way, but if you look at it as Pangaea then it makes more sense. And I did mean crossbred not inbred but there would have also been a lot of that in ancient times.

alayna's picture
Ya know idk why you guys are debating over this.....

Women created Man! period the end!

stl's picture

Ignorance really is bliss if it's a fact than prove it! Prove where when and who the DNA came from, prove Where the humans came from it cant even be proven they are from Africa let alone anywhere else.who what when where you have no idea you are reading one persons opinion that is it an opinion if you don't get that than refer to the beginning of the post it cannot be proven it is not a fact this is like saying he knows when time began there is no positive answer. It's a fact the you are not getting the point. The only factual point of this post is the comparison between modern DNA that they know where it all came from. It's clear that Neanderthals are also humans, and thus, any Cro-Magnon / Neanderthal mix is still...purely human. There are also many scientists that believe there where many different sub species living side by side. Therefore making it a point that modern human and Neanderthal are 2 different species both being human. So the question is how can you say one is more pure than the other and who is original? There are way to many variables to say it is fact. You could then say hypothetically the opposite of this that Neanderthal's are the original human meaning African's have no human DNA right? Im not saying this but think about it. Maybe you should change the title to a my opinion. But now if the title said African's do not show signs of recovered Neanderthal DNA ( guessing they only came up with about 60% from the fossils) that would make sense. This is the same as judging someone by their skin color they are still human right?

stl's picture

If you believe in pangea it kinda blows the whole theory to hell. But then again I find most things based off of carbon dating to be inconclusive for all we know they may find another body in a few years and say the opposite. But most ancient DNA strands are incomplete which is the main problem in cloning dinosaurs. If this was true I have no problem with being the least associated with a Neanderthal. But then again how did anyone become inbreed. It makes the most sense to start with pangea then add evolution to each continent based on survival the distance from the equator, types of food eaten plants animals ect..
And yes the title does come off very racist

stl's picture

Its still offensive

alayna's picture

Hmmmm idk I still like the theory that the Anunnaki/Aliens manipulated primates and created man...

MONK's picture

I like your thinking. What about the Hollow Earth theory? it always stuck with me in a weird way, idk. Lost many of hours diving deeper and deeper into the rabbit hole of information on the subject. If that makes me a hippie mother fucker, well screw you guys I'm going home Biggrin

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 1
alayna's picture

or what about Panspermia or the Aquatic Ape theory? At this point who the hell knows anything is possible...I mean especially since we figured out that earth isn't flat! ;oP

alayna's picture

Well i'll tell you one thing that raised my eyebrow was a baby grows in water...amniotic fluid and it breathes in the water.....another thing that gave me a hummm moment was a fetus looks like an alien!

ReadyToKillIt's picture

Babies don't breathe water. They receive oxygen from the mothers blood via the umbilical cord.

MONK's picture

AAP I can get down with, however the panspermia theory is new to me.... You just made me step my game up LoL, i need SILENCE! I must READ! To the Dark side of the internet I go ....once AGAIN Biggrin

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 1
alayna's picture
oh mi you must be just like me lol....yah i spend a lot of time reading and researching...i've been learning a lot about the Alien theory idk i'm not sold on anything yet except that we have souls and were made of energy and energy cannot be destroyed...i've been a little busy these days learning about the Illuminati to look into Panspermia so i'd be interested to hear what you learn Smile
MONK's picture

Most definitely ;) oh the illuminati is a whole other beast entirely. In fact, I don't even fuck with that any more if I'm being honest. It is a never ending maze in which one can become easily entrapped lol. It genuinely began to effect the way which I viewed every day life, perhaps a lot of that is down to addictive personality idk :/

Anyway, I think we are officially off topic now lol PM you if I find anything good on Panspermia Biggrin

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 1
ReadyToKillIt's picture

You are the very first one I've EVER heard in agreement with me about humans being electrical signals (energy), and energy cannot be created or destroyed. Physical bodies die but the energy of the "soul" must go somewhere. However I'm not convinced yet that our consciousness follows that energy.

Greg's picture

X2

However I'm not convinced yet that our consciousness follows that energy

perhaps it's just part of a larger consciousness we are not fully aware of, i.e., it goes nowhere, it just is.

Engineereddisaster's picture

Are you white or black juice freak?

Cheatnnature's picture

They found the oldest form of human or subhuman in Asia. So it would make sense that they have more of the primitive DNA in them because figuratively speaking they are the original mutation. According to the study I read.

HllwdBdBoy's picture

this could be deemed an inflammatory post...

ReadyToKillIt's picture

Plz take no offense, but I think by your lack of reading it you have no business commenting. This had nothing to do with pigment. It was discussing alleles and possible genetic blending that occurred when yhese clans migrated. Again I'm not trying to be rude. I also agree that this should have been linked, not c&p.

Greg's picture

The problem is I don't think KKK people believe in science or evolution, so they just quickly shoot anything...

Should have, could have, stopped the sentence right there at "anything".

IrishMack's picture

What I LOVE the most about all these studies....The fact that just because all humans came from africa does not make us Black or negro to be concise. Different clans or races came from that immediate area and then migrated. So to tell the truth do they even know sometimes wtf they are talking about? Considering noone is alive from that time to back up any of their garbage.