posted Sun, 05/25/2014 - 02:57
2825
+ 5 MASS SPEC Biologic Pharma Tren Ace done by Angus
ad
Here you go guys... MASS SPECs on the Tren Ace in purchase from Biologic a few months ago...
Even though it was cloudy, this tren put up a respectable 73% purity...
Definitely not the best I have seen but it's decent...
Ordered from:
- Bookmark
- 5
- 0
Mr.pumpI'm so glad the charade this dude was doing is over!! I've never saw someone so addicted to pathologically lying about anything an everything . Lmao! But it was entertaining at first to say the least.
RustyhookerHe will try to come back. New label etc. Scammers gonna scam!
Mr.pumpProb is already! Lurking around like a sewer rat! Lmao!
AnonThats actually decent gear right there but imo when you get down to 50 and lower its not so good
AnonDepends. You could have source A with 80% purity and source B with 70% purity raws for let's say test prop
Source B could put out a more potent product if he/she had the raws tested BEFORE brewing & compensated for the impurity by dosing it at 143%. This would give you an end product with 100.1mg/mL API ( Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient - stole this term from Angus ) which is accurately dosed
143 x .70 = 100.1
Source A could dose at 100%, like normal, and end product would be 80mg/mL….. still decent of course but not the full API dose listed on the label
100 x .80 = 80
My concern & something I'm trying to better understand is what these impurities actually are, we've heard "lipid filler" sure but when something is like 50% that's just a red flag for piss poor manufacturing procedures…. or it could just be intentionally cut more I suppose with something harmless… I'd like to know anyways
Anyways none of this matters with concern to Bio just a thought…. he's just re-selling chinese oils lol not applicable I'm not standing up for the guy….
AnonIm not either... i was just replying to the test result.. i wouldnt buy shit here after all i have seen posted
I've asked that question about 'cut' before. It's no different than any other 'drug' game I'm assuming. Depending on the origin of the powders (middle-man/factory direct) the seller will cut the product for profit. I wouldn't think it would be in the manufacturing process you would get a purity that low. If there was something dangerous in the MS Test ANGUS would relay that to us.....ex. Heavy Metals (I believe iron and aluminum would be considered inert In minuscule amounts though) The sad truth about all this is that more so than not, these products prove to be subpar, mislabeled, and inconsistent.
Anongrrr hate not understanding these things…. Only just started researching really this last week since I'm having some oils tested & actually have a bit of a life since my 16 credit hour semester is now over ( FKING MISTAKE ). Angus sent me some literature on mass specs reading up. I figured most likely scenario is a simple harmless cut of course, as you laid out.
Thing is we know so very little about how the manufacturing process is even done, Angus doesn't even know exactly how the synth takes place in detail from what I gather. This bothers me but I'm not educated enough to know if it should or not lol… which bothers me.
Best thing we can do as a community is continue to get more and more things tested I suppose…
I agree. Nothing wrong with doing some research. But I don't think you are incorrect that these unregulated powders produced can yield a low purity during the synth process. But when it gets to 40-50% I have to assume that it is a 'cut' to increase profit margins. If you follow William Liewellyn, he's got some good informative info on steroids in general.
AnonI dont, I'll start reading up
RustyhookerIn chem class we did a lot of separating chemicals to get a pure product out of a blend. Seems that should be possible with roids as well.
Llewellen cites that much of the impurities are heavy metals. Heavy metals are toxic. So, knowing which are lipids and which spike are metals would be nice.
AnonI've thought of this as well as I have purified non AAS related drugs myself ( don't ask ). But the only thing we're worried about at the end of the day is the metals right, I've read about some acidic contaminants as well but not a reliable source of info…. removing the lipids wouldn't accomplish much. I have no idea how to remove trace amounts of metals, we're talking parts per million unless a sample is heavily contaminated that's too small to even pretend to conceptualize. I'd like to have some raws test results on my computer uploaded onto excel so I could go through & identify exactly what the impurities are or at least get an idea where there's a will there's a way lol. I did it with IRA spectrometry…. at some point in time in a class I hardly remember… I got this gimme the info I'll figure it out eventually :S
RustyhookerMaybe melt points for separating. But yes, it could also be an expensive endeavor. And the worlds biggest ugl's with the funds gives 2 chits to improve.
+1 for testing
hunteron20s73% is a good thing as it is real gear but a lil low but not bad +1
AnonThank you Sir +1
Give them a vote if you find it helpful.Permalink