Good looking results. I’m jealous :(

Clean panel overall most of your markers are sitting optimal or in range, which is genuinely good for what you're running. But a few things worth flagging, including one correction on your hematocrit reasoning and a real concern about the var.
The hematocrit dropping after pulling primo your read is probably wrong, and here's why it matters:
Your hematocrit went from 53 down to 42.77, and you're attributing it to dropping the primo. That's likely a misread of what's driving it. Hematocrit at 42.77 with hemoglobin 14.5 is actually on the lower side now that's a big drop from 53. Primo does contribute to erythrocytosis, but so does your test, and so does your tren, and frankly tren and test are bigger erythropoietic drivers than primo. So the primo coming out might account for some of the drop, but a swing from 53 to 42.77 is large that's more than just removing one moderate compound. Worth considering whether something else changed: hydration status at the two draws (a big one if you were dehydrated at the 53 reading and well-hydrated now, that alone explains a chunk), blood donation between tests, or other variables. The point is don't confidently credit the primo for the whole swing, because if your hematocrit is genuinely now at 42.77, that's a real drop you'd want to understand, not just attribute to one compound. At 42.77 you're actually fine on the hematocrit front now (no polycythemia concern at all), which is good just don't assume you've "solved" hematocrit by pulling primo when test and tren are still your bigger drivers and the number may partly reflect hydration or donation.
The compound logic and this connects to a principle worth understanding:
Here's something about running tren with test that's worth knowing: tren and testosterone compete for the androgen receptor, and tren has a much higher binding affinity it largely wins that competition. So when you run a high tren dose alongside test, you don't necessarily need to increase test; the tren is occupying the receptors potently. Some people actually run test lower when tren is in the mix for this reason. You're at 210 test with 105 tren, which is a reasonable ratio your test isn't high, so this isn't a problem for you, just noting the principle since it's relevant to how these two interact. Your modest test dose with the tren is actually sensible.
The var at 75mg daily this is the thing I'd actually push back on:
75mg of anavar daily is a high dose, and I'd question why you're there. Anavar is liver-toxic (it's a 17-alpha-alkylated oral), and the hepatotoxicity scales with dose. Most of anavar's benefit comes at much lower doses 20-50mg daily is where the bulk of the effect is, and going to 75mg mostly adds liver and lipid cost for diminishing returns. Your liver markers actually look okay right now (GGT 27.2, ALT and AST fine, ALP normal) but that's exactly why you don't want to push the var dose, because you've got clean liver values and 75mg daily is the kind of dose that erodes them over time. I'd genuinely consider dropping to 50mg or even 20-50mg range you'd keep most of the benefit and take meaningfully less hepatic and lipid hit. The 75mg isn't buying you proportionally more; it's buying you more liver and lipid risk. Why are you at 75 specifically? If there's no specific reason, lower it.
Your lipids this is the real flag, and pulling primo won't fix it:
Your HDL is 29.8 (low flagged out of range) and your LDL/ApoB ratio is also flagged. So your protective HDL is suppressed. Here's the honest part: you may have dropped the primo partly hoping to help your lipids, but primo wasn't your main lipid problem your tren and your var are. Tren crushes HDL hard, and oral anavar at 75mg daily is also significantly suppressing your HDL. So removing the primo does little for your lipids because the two compounds actually hammering your HDL (tren and high-dose var) are still in the stack. If your lipids are a concern, the levers that matter are the tren and especially that 75mg var dropping the var dose would help your HDL more than removing the primo did. The good news: your ApoB at 73.1 is actually in good range, and your total cholesterol (132) and triglycerides (86.8) and remnant cholesterol are all fine so it's specifically the HDL that's suppressed, which is the classic tren/oral signature. Still, HDL at 29.8 is low, and the fix is addressing the tren and var, not the primo that's already gone.
One honest limitation: without your pre-cycle baseline, I can't tell you how far your HDL actually dropped from your personal starting point if you can get baseline bloods next time, that context helps a lot. But HDL at 29.8 is low regardless of baseline, and it's the tren and var driving it.
The genuinely reassuring stuff:
Your kidney markers are great (creatinine 0.708, low end good). Your liver is currently fine (GGT 27.2, ALT/AST in range, ALP 77.7) which is exactly why I'd protect it by not pushing the var. Your inflammation marker hs-CRP at 0.776 is optimal (low inflammation, good). ApoB 73.1 is in good range. Fructosamine 229 and your glucose markers are fine (no glucose issue). Ferritin 329 is fine. Vitamin D 63.8 is good. Thyroid (free T3 2.50) is okay. E2 at 28 is actually well controlled with no AI that's the mast helping, and 28 is a nice place to be, don't touch it. Albumin and electrolytes fine. So the bulk of your panel is genuinely healthy.
One note: your SHBG is 7.97 (low) and free test 344 (high) expected on cycle with that SHBG, more of your test is free. Total test 947 is solid. LH and FSH would be suppressed (expected on cycle). Nothing alarming there.
Bottom line:
Clean panel mostly, but: don't credit the primo for the whole hematocrit drop (53=>42.77 is large test and tren are your bigger drivers, and hydration/donation may explain part of it; you're fine at 42.77 either way). The two real things to address: that 75mg var (high dose, unnecessary hepatic and lipid cost drop to 50 or lower, you keep most of the benefit), and your low HDL (29.8), which is driven by the tren and the high-dose var, NOT the primo you removed so if lipids matter, the var dose is your lever, not the primo. Your E2 at 28 is well-managed by the mast (good), your liver is currently clean (protect it by lowering the var), and your kidney, inflammation, and glucose markers are all healthy. Get a baseline next time so you can actually see how far your HDL moved. The main actionable item: reconsider that 75mg var it's the thing adding the most unnecessary risk on an otherwise clean panel.