posted Sat, 04/19/2014 - 12:36
3074
+ 7 Domestic x eq lab test
ad
I decided to have these tests done because my gf was using this eq for about 8 weeks and she started to get terrible acne to the point where they are blood blisters and are painful. It was from the X-line. The main reason I had the tests done is to see if there really was eq in there and not test or something. I don't think eq causes blood blisters.
Ordered from:
- Bookmark
- 7
- 0
Did you get a hold of X to see what could or should be done?
He contacted me. Well see what happens.
Same here; I had the same thing as you. He contacted me. I dealt with him exclusively and he always fixed any issues. Lets hope he takes care of us on this one.
Same thing with the acne or the equipoise?
no real big acne problem.
Sent you a fr
Accepted
epcfitnessHow's the acne on your lady? Did she have second thoughts about maybe trying accutane?
Eh it's healing very slowly. Her skin is starting to scar now so instead of the blood blisters there are smooth flat red marks everywhere but she says her pain is actually bearable now and deff less than before. I hope her skin heals back to normal or at least close to normal.
I just received some gear from X yesterday by some of lab I've never heard of. SPIKE GEAR. Considering it's almost 2 months over due and I wrote it off of ago and followed up with some bad reviews of my experience with x, I'm a little concerned about infecting before testing it. Where can I go to get this tested in the states and what does it cost and how much is needed to conduct the test?
Thanks
https://www.eroids.com/users/angus. This is the guy you want to talk to about testing gear. I sent the eq to him and a $75 lab fee and he emailed me the results. he won't let you down, shoot him a FR and PM. You can send him as many vials of anything as you need. The more vials the more expensive it will be. I sent one vial. i would hold off on whatever gear you got until X gets back on track.
+1 for testing
Anon65% Pure ± underdosed = bullshit
skalpax2
Does this source test his raws? You would think they would know better by now. With alot more Eroids members with access to MS and even getting BW done, I think more and more sources are going to get called out and are going to have to up their game. Its irritating for myself and I assume everyone else that sources try to take advantage of the consumer... +1 for testing.
He has been MIA for awhile now, I don't think he is coming back and if he does hopefully he has his shit back together. X was my first source and was great. Just goes to show how much things can change in a year...
Yea I'm not sure what he's up to now. If you guys flip through his photos there are pictures of a mass spec on his sustanon with a .01% purity. He said the raws he got were bad and he would make amends which he did. His test e was also under dosed and he reshipped me some more. This eq was from his promo back in late august, so I'm not sure how his gear is now or if he's made any changes.
RustyhookerUnderdosed at 150.
Purity and dose is different.
I never trusted X ... Ballsy move using his line for your girl's cycle. Atleast it's eq tho.. And probably inadvertently did your girl a favor making it under dosed... Looks like the andro sides are kicking in
Damn, this sucks. X used to be such a solid source....+2 for testing bro
What a piece of shit. Sorry to hear about your gf. +1 for testing
Is it 250 mg/ml or 150mg/ml?
150mg/ml. Underdosed
It said on the vial 250mg/ml but after labs came back they tested it was only 150mg/ml, so underdosed.
Wouldn't that be closer to 100 mg/ml since it's only 65% purity?
Purity and dosage are different. You really can't measure them together, It'd be like comparing apples and oranges. I think what you did was .65 x 250mg/ml. They also use two different units of measure. So multiplying them together would give you an inaccurate answer. Im no scientist, I'm just going by what I remember from chem 101 and physics 101 lol, someone chime in if Im wrong.
The way I understood it was that they actually used 150 mg/ml of raw material (which is way underdosed than their 250 mg/ml target). And the 65% purity represented the purity of the raws used. So 65% of 150 mg/ml should be equal to approximately 100 mg/ml of finished product. However I might be wrong also.
noob941+1 for labs