Beaker's picture
Beaker
  • 76
4828

+ 21 Big D Primobolan Enanthate Labs

ad

I have run MSCA on BigD's Primo-E 200 and according to the labs the quality, dosing and purity is spot on! As you can see, the lipids (oils) are fresh and clean. There are few artifacts. Here is another side note, the oils used in the process are photo sensitive. If they are exposed to a lot of light over a long period of time, the photons break down the lipids and the "artifacts" are what is detected. Also, oil is basically a hydrocarbon. If it is "old" or left out for too long, then the oils will begin to be oxidized and you will see a higher count of oxygen. All in all a LOT of data to consume and make sense of. I am trying to clarify and add understandable detail to the data presented here. As far a dosing is concerned, it is an extrapolation of existing data sets. The more labs that are run the better the extrapolation will be and thus more accurate on the dosing levels. I hope this adds a bit more information to what your reading.

ninjeestars's picture

Ok I may not be reading this right or maybe this is just over my head but when i look up the molecular weight of methenolone enanthate I find 414.62. I don't see that number reflected in the results. Is that not how this works?

Rawman's picture

Just grabed 6 bottles of these:)

roidjunky79's picture

+1

Beaker's picture

To ALL... Thank you all very much! I do this so we ALL can get a better idea of who is serious and who is not. I think we can start to see a pattern.... The ranking system here is more accurate than previously thought. Preconceived notions, and poor information will be replaced with hard fucking facts, and you can not argue with facts. They sit and stare you down. More to come. Buff will PM ... Big D will PM next week!

budzang's picture

Spoken like a true professional.

Hardened-Johnson's picture

+1 thanks for the info brother.

Darktide's picture

Great work these lab tests are a huge benefit to the members here. Thank you for your time and effort.

MegaT883's picture

Keep them coming scdaub much appreciated +1

sc2216's picture

More results are coming soon, keep a close eye on the "lab tests" section in the up coming days/weeks, can't tell you right now what labs are gonna be tested, but you guys are gonna love it!

sc2216's picture

These tests are just awesome, we have to accumulate as many samples as possible to have a huge database to compare the samples with each other, we are getting good at this!

gurn's picture

Hold on let me get my chemist so he can explain these to me.

j0n's picture

+1 thanks for all this work brother. are these sources giving you freebies? if not contact me and i will make the case for you. thanks

Carlos Danger's picture

Brother IMO u should never have to pay for Gear ever again from these Sources. U are doing more for them getting these tests than u would be buying their gear. Seriously bro if I were any of these sources I'd just send u gear for free just to show my appreciation.

snuka2012's picture

Yep...as a source, if you're highly confident and can stand by the quality of your gear, send it over. Best advertisement ever...gotta send the man free gear.

AlphaTiger2011's picture

lmao X10

Beaker's picture

Much respect to you brother +1

snuka2012's picture

Excellent info as always. Thumbs up.

Beaker's picture

And it is humbly accepted! I am honestly doing all this for the community. I want you to know.. just like I do.. what IS what and who HAS what. There are a lot of good, honest sources here. there are also some .... um... not so good. Lets say the ranking system here is pretty fucking accurate on the quality... I have a LOT of labs to run and have put a temp hold on any more tests due to the back log! I will resume the labs once I can breath!

riproll4's picture

Good work scdaub +1

Beaker's picture

Thank you very much! I am trying very hard to standardize these labs and present the data in a format we can understand. There is a LOT of physics and atomic calculus that is here and the avg bear is not aware.... me included.I am on a knowledge crash course and will try my best to add digestible detail to the data. The dosing question keeps coming up. Think of it this way.... In order to have a solid reading, it must be compared to a known base. There is no database that exists that contains the compounds that are being tested. So... like the Primo.. we can only test several and then SEE a pattern.. then, by interpretation of the data points, form a base. Now, for the Test-E, I have pharma grade Watson 200mg/ml. Lets call that 100. Then, I run a lab on a test-e 300/ml and it comes back @ 150... then we know it is dosed correctly. 1.5*200 =300 or there abouts... If it came back @ like.. 75 then we know it is 150mg/ml. See, we have to have a known base line to refer to for accuracy. More tests.. more accurate as there more data points to refer to. Again, any questions i will do my best to answer. I am not a lab rat.. just a gym rat that happens to be very interested in the lab! More to come!

Beaker's picture

A side note: The dosing is not here because this is the 2nd lab run. This IS the base line. The last page indicated a purity of 85% (or more) which can only be achieved from the compound being present and in quantity. If you compare this to the prior lab that was shown against BodySynthetics.. you will notice Body's was up there too. In comparison, the other sample was 20%.. or less. So, extrapolation out.. does indicate a correlation to the other known Primo-E @ 200. Make sense?

AlphaTiger2011's picture

I Think we should know who's product had the 20% that's why these labs are done, just imo

Beaker's picture

The person that ran that lab... did not want that information posted. It was their decision. They were in contact with the src.. and have worked out what happened and why.

PapaSwole's picture

So who's primo.is of higher quality

Beaker's picture

Honestly........ six of one ½ dozen of the other... these are some DAMN quality oils my friend!

sc2216's picture
  • 1 from me brother!