Unless prepping I always ran long ester E, even with short ester oils. Prop is just too much oil to get to my 600-700mg sweet spot. Adds either 2ml EOD or 1ml ED. Personally too TrenA > E any day of the week. Feels better, less sides for me and I can manage it more
I’m a long ester guy too for most things. I don’t really buy into the whole “short esters hit harder” idea in terms of actual peak muscle tissue levels. The only two exceptions for me are NPP and Tren A.
NPP, to me, feels like a completely different compound than Deca. Yeah, it’s nandrolone on paper … but it doesn’t feel the same, doesn’t bloat the same, doesn’t build the same way. Much cleaner, faster acting, easier to control. I remember Kurt Havens mentioning that short esters may never truly “peak” the same way long esters do, so you don’t get that full accumulation effect. Makes sense from a pharmacokinetic standpoint… but I’m still half on the fence about it. Real-world feel sometimes says otherwise.
Same with Tren A. I’d rather pin ED and deal with the frequency than run Tren E twice a week. Tren A just feels like the “real” Tren to me … faster feedback, easier to adjust, easier to pull if sides creep in. Especially with 19-nors, control is everything.
Now, I’ve also heard the argument that mg per mg you may accumulate more total active hormone over time with Enanthate because of the steady build-up and longer peak exposure. That logic tracks too. But for me, side management > theoretical accumulation.
I mean…They can reach the same active levels IMHO but because they clear faster, you don’t get that same long accumulation curve unless pinned very frequently.
End of the day, whether it’s offseason or prep, bulking or cutting … with 19-nors I’d rather have control than convenience.
Nice Tren !!Tren ace always ed pinning eod didn’t feel right for me
Underrated source
Interesting stash, bro
Test E + EQ + Tren A is a serious combo. Nice touch with the free Tren A too.
You running the Tren A daily or EOD? I’m curious … do you prefer acetate even while the rest is long esters?
Should be a strong, steady push with some serious recomposition potential if diet’s on point. Keep us posted how it treats you.
Jrihard89Unless prepping I always ran long ester E, even with short ester oils. Prop is just too much oil to get to my 600-700mg sweet spot. Adds either 2ml EOD or 1ml ED. Personally too TrenA > E any day of the week. Feels better, less sides for me and I can manage it more
I couldn’t agree more, brother.
I’m a long ester guy too for most things. I don’t really buy into the whole “short esters hit harder” idea in terms of actual peak muscle tissue levels. The only two exceptions for me are NPP and Tren A.
NPP, to me, feels like a completely different compound than Deca. Yeah, it’s nandrolone on paper … but it doesn’t feel the same, doesn’t bloat the same, doesn’t build the same way. Much cleaner, faster acting, easier to control. I remember Kurt Havens mentioning that short esters may never truly “peak” the same way long esters do, so you don’t get that full accumulation effect. Makes sense from a pharmacokinetic standpoint… but I’m still half on the fence about it. Real-world feel sometimes says otherwise.
Same with Tren A. I’d rather pin ED and deal with the frequency than run Tren E twice a week. Tren A just feels like the “real” Tren to me … faster feedback, easier to adjust, easier to pull if sides creep in. Especially with 19-nors, control is everything.
Now, I’ve also heard the argument that mg per mg you may accumulate more total active hormone over time with Enanthate because of the steady build-up and longer peak exposure. That logic tracks too. But for me, side management > theoretical accumulation.
I mean…They can reach the same active levels IMHO but because they clear faster, you don’t get that same long accumulation curve unless pinned very frequently.
End of the day, whether it’s offseason or prep, bulking or cutting … with 19-nors I’d rather have control than convenience.
I’m with you on that one, brother. --