Are u serious?

to clarify:

im pretty consistent with what ive been saying and cycle history. I did run deca my 2nd time around, but because of peoples suggestion here to use npp, so i jumped ship mid cycle and switched to prop and npp instead to finish off my cycle, hence why it shows up twice. because technically i finished with a npp cycle second time around and dropped the deca altogether which is why i didnt bother to list it. and started with a test and npp cycle again, why it shows up twice. i was taking peoples advice here not to use tren but start off with npp instead, so i did. i also was in the middle of my test e/eq cycle based on the recommendations on here but decided to jump ship again and switched to test prop and tren ace after i found it in my stash that i must of bought it and forgot about to finish that cycle off and just completed it 2 1/2 weeks ago and am now on pct (8 weeks of test e and eq planned for 16 weeks but switched to test prop and tren ace for the last 8 weeks) and you still did not answer my original question but instead pointed out my inconsistencies. i hope i have answered all your questions and hope you can answer mine.

i am questioning the supposed "golden" rule that your test has to be higher than or equal to the stacking compound. it does not make sense to me since npp is a stronger compound and will bind to your androgen receptors and will beat out testosterone alone since they are both competing for the same receptor. and i think the your lower test means lower chance of aromatization because we only have so many steroid receptors and once it is filled, you have all this excess test running with a greater chance of aromatizing. so in theory, less side effects since the estrogen conversion rate of deca/npp is only 20% than testosterone alone. i also researched that people have been running tren higher than prop recently on multiple steroid boards with great success and no "tren dick" so i am wondering since they are both 19-nor steroids, if people have used this method in the past and would like feedback on it. and if it can be done with npp as well (higher npp/low-moderate test).