portuguesepride's picture
portuguesepride
  • 34
1643

Short Cycles

ad

I'm talking about cycles 6 weeks or less. I know they go against conventional wisdom but, has any had any success with them? The idea of them sounds great, less pct time, less sides and being able to do more overall cycles in a given year. I read some articles and it tweaked my interest. Can anyone shed some light over here?

Roid Noid's picture
portuguesepride's picture

yeah this is a marathon not a sprint. and i like to stay relatively side free...as most would lol im definately playing with the idea

carnivore74's picture

hey portuguese! I'm one of you fucker! viva o benfica caralho! btw, i prefer longer cycles.

portuguesepride's picture

sou benfiquista tambem porra! yeah man ive never tried a short one and was just curious

HllwdBdBoy's picture

I'm a (personal) fan of short cycles. They're not really recommended for the novice user because short cycles = short esters = lotsa pinning (Good thing I'm a FREAK and LOVE PIP!)

Keep it simple and you don't need to get too clever (1 or 2 compounds)and gains(per usual) will be dictated by diet.

(Obviously) NOT recommended for MASS builders but if ur looking for slow, steady, sustainable gains, then its a viable option

portuguesepride's picture

yea i actually love test prop and i wanna try maybe a 6 weeker to be able to get a comparison. i dont think i could go shorter than 6 weeks but if its worth it i may give it a try

HllwdBdBoy's picture

not sure what ur particular stats/goals are... but test p/var gives a realllly nice look!

killinit88's picture

http://www.silownia.net/steroids/a/12221

not sure if you read this one, but i looked into it once and it had the most info. the concept is good, but not for what i am trying to do. Hope it helps brotha

portuguesepride's picture

yeah man, i already read that article lol good information