Allot of mixed reviews and opinions on blends. I always figured how do you know what compound is doing what when you have 3-5 in one vial. The first argument(and a good one)is Sust. For years Sust has been popular and effective. I'll ride in that car.

Now what about the other 50 "blends" or "boutique blends" as I've recently heard these concoctions called? Tren and Mast together huh? I'd run one or the other but not together, that is just me. 5 esters of test: with all those absorption rates I find a high peak in the middle at about 4 days so what is the point? Run some straight TPP, pin every three days and keep it simple.

Here is something I just thought of and really hit me. Getting these compounds in one vial at the correct mg of each is simple math. The trick is getting any of these to "hold" at these so claimed concentrations. Putting all the somewhat sensitive %/ratio of solvent, co-solvent, carriers that are dependent on those % and mixing them with other compounds of above mentioned "parts" seems a crash of the final product is in order. The chit isn't crashing but reports of these "blends" missing a advertised active ingredient is showing up here and other places.

I am no chemist by any stretch of the imagination. I am sure there are some really smart peeps with allot of trials and errors, collected data and the best lab equipment available and all the sometimes pricey raws to play mad scientist, but what are they using now and do they give a rat fucking shit about your health?

We love the idea of 500mgs in one cc. We lean towards the simple and easy one draw and pin :-). I myself am going to stick to my reading glasses and counting the lines and keeping my compounds to three at a time so I have at least a clue what is going in and going on.

I think my new cycle is working cause I always have a gripe and an axe to grind....lol

I really am Old School, literally ;-)