posted Fri, 12/29/2023 - 05:48
1211
People who have used anavar: It's anabolic rating, make it make sense?
ad
Anavar confuses me. It has an anabolic/androgenic ratio of 322-630:24
This makes no sense to me as it's anabolic rating is near (or over) the level of tren ace. Yet, many describe it as being extremely mild for bulking.
How does that make any sense? Is it just because it holds no water weight, so there's no initial effect of looking bulkier, but in reality the actual amount of real muscle gain you keep are high compared to most other AAS? Or is the muscle growth from it actually mild?
On paper, it sounds like it should be one of the best bulking agents out there.
Let me know your thoughts
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
They came up with these anabolic ratings by comparing compounds vs testosterone in rats. Unless you are a rat , the anabolic ratings are bs
KonstantViktoryIt's about androgen receptor activity apparently. I'd honestly agree though, quality Anavar is the shiznit. Great anabolism and low androgenic side effects as the rating implies. Inversely enough though, you get all the other androgenic sides from it in a hardening manner. If you're just measuring androgenic activity in 1/1/1 on a three base method then that full 1/3 is in full effect - hardening and strength. The other two probably something like "anger and agression/libido" and "hair and prostate growth"... Lol...
Anabolic/Androgenic ratio doesn’t always translate to how a hormone actually acts in your body. Bulking vs cutting depends on your diet and calorie intake not the drugs. So, sure you could bulk on anavar. As long as using orals don’t kill your appetite (common side affect among many users of oral AAS) I don’t see why anavar would be any different. Anavar produces insane strength ime. A much as tren or Anadrol ime. Harden and tighten up and get strong AF. Anadrol fills you out more. Wibstrol drys you out more. There’s a lot of tools in the arsenal, it’s just which ones compliment your body, and persisting goals.
So those numbers for anavar and other compounds aren't always accurate, with some more closer to their stated ratios than others. It's a toss up. You have to remember most of those ratios for anabolics come from the testing of various parts of a rat. From this you get anabolic/ androgenic scores. Again this is not totally accurate and that's been proven and Anavar is a good example of this. Just because it tested good on paper doesn't always apply to real life applications. This applies to alot of hormones. So with this it won't make sense.
Your first mistake is looking at the ratio and reading to much into it. What you see there has little to do with how the compounds actually react once ingested. Look at mtren anabolic rating of 30k
Halo at 2k. Cheq drops at 4k. We all know these compounds don’t do jack shit as far as building tissue, but they should on paper right 
You have your classic wet/dry compounds and hardeners and tissue builders. You can get an idea where the compounds may fall based on the ratio but their efficacy can be a totally different story than what the ratio would suggest
I’ve run Anavar several times, but my body fat was never low enough to see all the cutting hype I’ve always heard about. Now, about two months ago I got in on a great sources promo, so being that I had already recently purchased what I needed for this recent cut cycle from the same source, I figured I’d take some of his Anavar and throw it into my Winstrol, Mast, Tren, T Prop cycle. Well, after two weeks I dropped it because combined with the other compounds, it felt like I was running Anadrol, without the Anadrol sides. It was definitely bulking me up, in a very good way, but was not my goal at all. Anavar definitely has bulking properties, because I was definitely dieting hard, and never expected it to do that. Although, that’s what happens when I decide to do some dumb Frankenstein shit, LOL. Good thing is that the bulking subsided immediately when I dropped it.
Anabolic....muscle retention during fasting. Yes, its amazing.
Its along the same lines as trenbolone is although not quite as strong in terms of its visual effects - it won't make you look massive overnight like anadrol or dianabol will due to immense water/glycogen retention and a bit of fat gain, but what you will gain is lean muscle and most likely more of it than on the other 2. Got to bare in mind its androgenic rating is pretty low where as the Devils piss is still at 500.