Who here is NOT running peptides?
I was going to create a poll, I'm still learning to navigate this site. I'm curious how many of us Are NOT on or planning on using non FDA approved peptides? Peptides is such a broad term, I know. I only really heard people talk about steroids. I get nervous watching young people experimenting these days, so casually. I've got young kids that I think about. At the same time I'm also curious to see what the hype is all about lol. I just think... all these peptides seemed to come out of nowhere. I read about new ones all the time. I think "how can these things possibly have the research on humans behind them?" Im guessing people here aren't too concerned about the horror stories you hear about ozempic? how it may cause osteoporosis etc? I haven't been reading anyone is having issues.
Is everyone on these nowadays!? Are any of you committed to sticking with old school steroids and not running peptides? For reasons similar to mine? I'm wondering... Am I the only one not on these lol?
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
Me
I think you are right to scrutinize everything that you put into your body. It is especially important to be careful about what you inject. However, I’d say that most of the commonly used peptides are on the level of risk of driving a car with your seatbelt on. And UGL gear is on the level of riding a motorcycle without a helmet.
Only pussies wear helmets anyways
not everybody runs them but alot do. i kind of classify gh and hcg/hmg apart from all the new peptides even tho they are peps at the end of the day. but they have been used for a lot longer and are way more trusted and people know a decent amount about them. but most dont even think about the long term effects. in essence anyone who is taking these new peps are the test subjects lol. personally i tried alot of the igfs, cjcs from multiple different sources and they did absolutely nothing, didnt even have any of the potential side effects. but alpt of people swear by the igfs, but then again people were swearing by certain brands of test hat were horribly underdosed or straight vitamin e oil. and then you have alpt of hyper responders that get benefits from taking small amounts of stuff, which i am truly jealous of haha. but for awhile now i would only ever do gh and hcg/hmg, never gonna bother with any other peps ever again even if they were free.
I've only used Reta and BPC 157. Reta is in Phase 3 Trials and will most likely be approved by the FDA in the near future. It's also funny to see steroids phrased in such a way as being safe. Tren literally has 0 FDA trials and EQ is intended for horses.
We all trust the sources we get stuff from are doing things right, but at the end of the day it's apart of the risk we take. I mean I get peptides from China and trust they are safe to consume lol.
But to give some input to your question, outside of the GLP-1 family most peptides don't really do what they say they are gonna do or it isn't noticeable enough to continue paying for it. I would say a lot of people in this space have tried them, but they are pretty underwhelming compared to AAS or GLP-1s.
I think nearly 100% of the eroids population is on some type of pep. GH is a pep as well, and most run that, and if not that then some type of GLP or something like the wolverine stack.