Ok. So what im gathering is that in the end, the test clearly shows that the TEST E 300 is really TEST E 150. Bottom line. Now, as long as I know that going in, thats one thing, however thinking its 300 and pinning 2x wk would really fuck up my cycle, and possibly my body depending on what else was going on. Im kinda ticked to see this, bc I just had an incident with another source that had awesome gear, but the last 5 bottles of cyp I got were either underdosed or bunk, and I just noticed Im coming off cycle. Had to get some prop and kick back in, plus switch tests... sucks. Someone reffered me to Stealth as a replacement for my old source, but this has made me hesitate.... would love some communication from src and from angus.
Glad to hear that bc I'd buy some asap, I'm kinda in a jam, not sure how far off I've gotten. I know I don't like pinning prop150 eod, bc the pip is kinda rough...You were referred to me by a reliable member as a safety net, and I'd like to pull the trigger...I know tests can be skewed, so hopefully that's the case..
So the tester, Beaker or Angus or whoever fucked this up? That's not good. Calls their credibility into question especially seeing that this is NOT the first test I've seen that was inaccurate. I saw another test where the purity came back as "100%" but someone did the math on the lab report wrong and it should have been much lower. This is no bueno
Looks like no one really knows what's what or how much. Or shit else. I'm not knocking angus. I'm not knocking stealth. But this is an unverifiable world we are in. By that I mean the internet. My handy dandy spectrometer is in my ass and shoulder. I put the gear in there and if I get the results I'm suppose to with that compound. I will say it's good. Stealths tri-blend and test prop (the ones I received) are good products. Good looking out 99. Regardless I think what you've been doing is a great service. Stealth I'll order some of your E next time and see for myself.
Yeah I'm not sure what the deal was as I know for a 100% fact every test e bottle I send out is between 300-325mg. Why would I send off underdosed product when I know it's being tested? I trust angus 100% but I'm not sure how we got this outcome.
You are the hot commodity right now 99. Thanks for taking your own $$$ and protecting the community. I wish my +1 counted for more than what you have spent on gear and testing. While my karma can't compensate your financial losses lately, you can take solace in the fact you have kept many brothers safe.
Please read below. 90% purity is excellent, but there was only a recorded 150mg/ml. Not the advertised 300mg/ml. That would really fuck up peoples cycle/system only running half of what they think they are running.
I've sold 100s, if not 1000s of test e with zero complaints. I think most people with a little knowledge about gear would know if they were only running 300mg versus 600mg. Angus is running test again because CNC tren a was present in test.
"However, that part of the test is merely to confirm that the compound in question is actually the compound stated. It has no bearing on purity or potency." ANGUS
Bro TRUST me, that gear isn't under dosed. I does every test e bottle between 300-325 mg. We aren't sure why test showed up this way, but we will get it figured it. I'm not going to underdose gear to save a COUPLE DOLLARS, I do not conduct business that way.
I don't know this source, I have never once had any dealings with them. I have absolutely no vendetta against them. I merely test and report. Logically it doesn't make sense for a source to underdose the cheapest compound there is, but on the same token I've seen some sources do some pretty dumb stuff, so I have no answers to why it might have happened, but I am confident the testing is accurate. We will rerun the test because the wrong elemental composition report was included, and report back, but like I said below, that portion of the test has nothing to do with purity or potency.
Actually, it looks like some data might be wrong in this report. On the elemental composition report page, the compound listed in the lower graph is Testosterone Propionate. Also, the molecular formula listed, C20H25O3, doesn't correspond to what I've found for Test E or Test P. Maybe there's a reason for this, idk.
The elemental composition report from another testee has somehow ended up in your report. That is the elemental composition report for CleanAndClear tren A which was tested on the same day. I will have the test rerun. However, that part of the test is merely to confirm that the compound in question is actually the compound stated. It has no bearing on purity or potency.
Any results yet on the retest?
X2
Ok. So what im gathering is that in the end, the test clearly shows that the TEST E 300 is really TEST E 150. Bottom line. Now, as long as I know that going in, thats one thing, however thinking its 300 and pinning 2x wk would really fuck up my cycle, and possibly my body depending on what else was going on. Im kinda ticked to see this, bc I just had an incident with another source that had awesome gear, but the last 5 bottles of cyp I got were either underdosed or bunk, and I just noticed Im coming off cycle. Had to get some prop and kick back in, plus switch tests... sucks. Someone reffered me to Stealth as a replacement for my old source, but this has made me hesitate.... would love some communication from src and from angus.
AnonAngus is running test again to see what the problem was. Not sure how how we got the outcome but it is not correct
Glad to hear that bc I'd buy some asap, I'm kinda in a jam, not sure how far off I've gotten. I know I don't like pinning prop150 eod, bc the pip is kinda rough...You were referred to me by a reliable member as a safety net, and I'd like to pull the trigger...I know tests can be skewed, so hopefully that's the case..
So the tester, Beaker or Angus or whoever fucked this up? That's not good. Calls their credibility into question especially seeing that this is NOT the first test I've seen that was inaccurate. I saw another test where the purity came back as "100%" but someone did the math on the lab report wrong and it should have been much lower. This is no bueno
AnonLooks like no one really knows what's what or how much. Or shit else. I'm not knocking angus. I'm not knocking stealth. But this is an unverifiable world we are in. By that I mean the internet. My handy dandy spectrometer is in my ass and shoulder. I put the gear in there and if I get the results I'm suppose to with that compound. I will say it's good. Stealths tri-blend and test prop (the ones I received) are good products. Good looking out 99. Regardless I think what you've been doing is a great service. Stealth I'll order some of your E next time and see for myself.
Man I feel the same way, too much room for human error in these tests obviously. I'm not knocking anyone either but something seems very off
AnonYeah I'm not sure what the deal was as I know for a 100% fact every test e bottle I send out is between 300-325mg. Why would I send off underdosed product when I know it's being tested? I trust angus 100% but I'm not sure how we got this outcome.
You are the hot commodity right now 99. Thanks for taking your own $$$ and protecting the community. I wish my +1 counted for more than what you have spent on gear and testing. While my karma can't compensate your financial losses lately, you can take solace in the fact you have kept many brothers safe.
shoxingbiceps17Sucks when sources are so greedy they have to underdose their gear...what a shame. glad I never ordered from them
AnonBro, 90% is damn good. You should be happy that there are sources pushing out products in the 90's
AnonOh, I see what's happening, I missed that part! Thanks for pointing it out.
Give them a vote if you find it helpful.Permalinkshoxingbiceps17Please read below. 90% purity is excellent, but there was only a recorded 150mg/ml. Not the advertised 300mg/ml. That would really fuck up peoples cycle/system only running half of what they think they are running.
AnonI've sold 100s, if not 1000s of test e with zero complaints. I think most people with a little knowledge about gear would know if they were only running 300mg versus 600mg. Angus is running test again because CNC tren a was present in test.
shoxingbiceps17"However, that part of the test is merely to confirm that the compound in question is actually the compound stated. It has no bearing on purity or potency." ANGUS
AnonBro TRUST me, that gear isn't under dosed. I does every test e bottle between 300-325 mg. We aren't sure why test showed up this way, but we will get it figured it. I'm not going to underdose gear to save a COUPLE DOLLARS, I do not conduct business that way.
shoxingbiceps17I guess we have to wait to see what Angus has to say. I don't want to doubt you, but at the moment its your word vs lab tests...
AnonWhy would I send underdosed gear that I know for a fact it's being tested?
shoxingbiceps17lol beats me, I'm just going by what the labs say
I also didn't know you knew about the testing, kinda defeats the purpose IMO
angusI don't know this source, I have never once had any dealings with them. I have absolutely no vendetta against them. I merely test and report. Logically it doesn't make sense for a source to underdose the cheapest compound there is, but on the same token I've seen some sources do some pretty dumb stuff, so I have no answers to why it might have happened, but I am confident the testing is accurate. We will rerun the test because the wrong elemental composition report was included, and report back, but like I said below, that portion of the test has nothing to do with purity or potency.
shoxingbiceps17I stand my ground. Thanks brother for clarifying!
AnonThanks for clarifying. I sent you a PM.
Give them a vote if you find it helpful.PermalinkMr.pumpVery nice !! Good testing bro!! Love what u do!! +1
Anon90% purity...ill take that
the test says that 300mg/ml is over estimated by 2 fold...
Actually, it looks like some data might be wrong in this report. On the elemental composition report page, the compound listed in the lower graph is Testosterone Propionate. Also, the molecular formula listed, C20H25O3, doesn't correspond to what I've found for Test E or Test P. Maybe there's a reason for this, idk.
AnonYes I also noticed that myself.
angusThe elemental composition report from another testee has somehow ended up in your report. That is the elemental composition report for CleanAndClear tren A which was tested on the same day. I will have the test rerun. However, that part of the test is merely to confirm that the compound in question is actually the compound stated. It has no bearing on purity or potency.
Thanks boss i have afew vials of that good test e +1
Thanks again TA! Any chance of getting clarification on the "overestimated by twofold" remark? I have 5 vials of these myself.
angusIt is 150mg/ml.
noob941+1 for the test brother and i take it that this means the test is 150mg/ml ?
That's a great question. Overestimated by twofold? Not quite sure I can translate that.