posted Sat, 11/23/2013 - 04:36
3781
+ 11 Mass Spec Test E by FX-SUPPLEMENTS
ad
So, as promised, here is another product from FX-Supplements. We are looking at a Testosterone Enanthate which comes in at 94% purity. Another shining example of the quality carried by this source. Test E is the base for many people and the compound of choice for a first or second cycle. Anyone that is looking at their first cycle will want a product that is clean and pure. This source is among the best for their testosterone purity and you can't go wrong with that. Thanks FX for putting it out there for all to see.
- Bookmark
- 11
- 0






TrenFreak89this is the best, gonna load up
RustyhookerGood to see ugl rise to this level!
good job bro!
It's not rocket science there buddy. Do I know what a sample is??? What the fuck kinda question is that?
Listen bro.
I'm not trying to say there's anything wrong with your product. However, me personally with my little 3 karma (because that's an adequate measurement of knowledge??) have decided that samples sent from sources don't necessarily dictate that someone placing an order tomorrow will receive the same thing. That's all. This has nothing to do with you though my man. Simply an observation.
Id even argue that a sample sent from a source is at least better than nothing. I'm sure your products are great. I've never read anything negative about FX.
wasn't trying smear your results homie. Just want this to be an informed community.
angusHopefully I can help a little here. There are many sources that have their gear tested for the sake of continually verifying that the material that they are receiving is up to their standards. It is not to sell people on their product. You are right, you have no idea that the material you receive it, in fact, the same that has been tested. That is the beauty of the system though, you can send your sample in and verify if you like. If a source is putting out shitty gear then they're going to get called on it. If they're testing at 90% and then a user sends a sample and it comes back at 40% and underdosed, you better believe that the integrity of that lab is gonna come into question. So there's a bit of check/balance there.
I know one guy that must have had 20 different labs tested before finally deciding on one and now that they have his trust he sends one in every month or so just to make sure that they are staying on track. It's his piece of mind. While that is a bit unusual, it is possible and that is what sets this site above all others. These guys know that if they're putting out subpar gear it is only a matter of time before they are discovered.
Amen and I'm with you all the way. If nothing else, homeboys testimonial above about his solid gains gives this lab that much more credibility.
FX I appreciate that you are willing to send in a sample in the first place because quite frankly, not every source is.
Not trying to come around and shit all over this thread. Just speaking my mind.
-seacrest out
The point of Angus&Beaker having the ability to test labs sending them product to test is outstanding. Of course you don't know what you order is the same as what they test. But the thing is you have the same opportunity to get what you have in your possession tested if you think that it is wrong by the same people. I can say that these people that test want quality product and if it's not up to par they will say so.
Another thing is what if the raws are below 90%? This doesn't mean that you are not getting what you are supposed to as well. This also helps lab's be able to make the proper adjustment when they process to make sure that you get what you are supposed to get. I guess my point is that if you don't see this testing as a quality control and you don't trust lab's than maybe this site or aas is not for you.
That is quite a nice response to such a statement.
Sorry. I don't trust samples submitted by sources. There's no way to know this is what is going to land when I order a pack. I trust angus and beaker, but I think the integrity of the test is compromised when the source sends the sample.
You mean that the Test E that FX sent to me might be cut with some baby laxative and baking soda! Say it aint so.
I imagine it's hard to put your trust into any UGL, hell you can't hardly trust big pharmaceutical companies.
FWI, I trust FX more than any other UGL simply because his stuff is giving me great gains and did not make me sick or infected.
Lol. Good input man. Thanks
I am glad to help! Please contact either myself or Angus if you want a lab run. We will be happy to help!
Beaker
Ryan714This a great move by you guys! Cant wait to see more tests from you and start trying this line for myself! +1
Not questioning but curious why the purity is calculated as 2.51/2.65 instead of 2.01/2.65 which is I think the area under the curves, right?
angusI believe that looks like an error, you are correct. But let me confirm with the lab before I say for sure. It will be Monday before I can do that. I went back and looked at the other ones that came out that day (14 in all) and I didn't see any similar issues.
FramerunnerThat's just awesome, keep it up fx!
FX is on his way up! +1
cool bro *1
Thanks. +1
Thanks again bro +1
AssUhlGreat job FX and thanks so much Angus! +1
Way to go FX!
Dayumm...he got that recipe !
Another great result +1 Fx gonna be busy LoL.