posted Fri, 01/22/2016 - 00:13
6526
+ 11 Shree Primobolan Lab Results
ad
Bought loads of Shree Primo for an 800mg 16 week cycle but after the Shree Anabolic Lab results were published I decided to get mine tested so I wouldn't be wasting my time.
Very pleased to find that according to this Steroid Check GC-MS testing they've actually come back massively over-dosed! 163mg per ml. Shree Batch No. SA - 392 Expiry 12/2017
Ordered from:
- Bookmark
- 12
- 1
163mg instead of 100mg? sounds crazy bro!
Have you experiences with Rolon ?
RustyhookerVery strange that cheap chems came back very underdosed in all cases. Test costs bout 3 bucks for 10 cc vial. Yet, the most expensive chem comes back overdosed by 63mg? Thats indian quality vontrol in effect. Lol
Right man, I swear I see more way more under dosed test, the cheapest drug then exotics or in this case the most expensive and highly faked compound out there. Makes no sense.
Test P is what I saw. Maybe it all really comes from the same manufacture with different labels.
Or maybe all using the same 'powder' source
musseldawg69If you want a 3rd party lab for testing use www.simec.ch
Be careful about unreliable lab testers that were proved fake like: www.steroidcheck.com. This lab is not able to do quantitative testing as they claim. Will take your money and draw results- so this us what I read from another source, knowing this I still dont trust shrees products, does any one trust steroid check or reccomend them if I were to do testing ?
SC is useful for powders...not finished oils, etc (GC/MS)
Testing methods such as HPLC or LC/MS/MS for finished products
So you saying the 163mg means nothing or that it's just not very accurate? Surely it shows the products not under-dosed at the least.
It's hard to say Monty. To test/vett the labs I was using (SIMEC...EXPERTOX...STEROID CHECK)
I would send an unlabeled 2mL sample vial of known mg/mL (Pharma or Compound Pharma)
SC seemed to be above or below the known mg/mL. So because of that, it's hard to say what the mg/mL would actually be IMO.
SC did Inform me they were going to be using LC/MS/MS in the near future
Alright cheers fella
musseldawg69Ok thanks for the info
Think that might be a stretch calling them 'fake', their lab checks out and you can call and speak to staff.
I don't think their testing method is as accurate as Simec and agree they would be the best option to test gear. Unfortunately when I arranged this I didn't realise Simec accepted private testing.
I trust that they've actually tested this, that the compounds present are accurate, and that the concentration is at least within 15-20% of what they claim which still makes it over-dosed.
DeathstrokeI haven't really explored Shree products but thank You for testing that's what this site is about
Good to see bro. I have 200amps those shree primo. All shree gear I was using was pure fire!! +1
Rolon too mate?
No yet bro. I have some Rolon for spring time.
Read some bad about batch sa-309 , which have you bro? Do you think it works fine like their test e. ? 'cause testo p works bad .
Yeah rolon I have SA-309 .... Where did you read about bad batch?
Hi mate, on muscleta** you can find the analyse 146mg/ml(rolon) If the analyse is real.
Rly , good reviews with testop? On anabolicl** the stuff was tested with 32mg/ml . Slowly I stop trust the reviews. Shree wrote that the tests are not real because they used wrong analyse method!?
Ok, thanks mate. I will find out. All used Shree products by me and few my friends were pretty damn good.... Why they put so much work to produce amps, boxes and verif. numbers to underdose test p like that ...??? produce test prop is so cheap ....
http://www.muscletalk.co.uk/m/tm.aspx?m=5364972&p=1
Shree is at the end of all the test results
Legit compound...but all underdosed unfortunately (Sust/ Rolon / Trebol)
That is the link what I've meant.
But I'm little bit sceptic bout these tests. They look not rly peofessional but maybe this guy works in a laboratory and prints just raw analyse prints without signature etc.
But Restanon is ok , little bit underdosed but no rly much, ans Tren is OK 80mg instead of 100mg is tolerable
I was using Restanon SA-173 exp. 8-16 and it was one of the best I ever used. Tren a was really good too but I don't have any left so I can't let you know what batch nr. I have bunch of primo and rolon and I'll give a shoot in few months. I hope that gear will be same good as rest shree I have used.
Yeah Restanon is good. I heard it from many guys . Also teston and testo cyp is workin' great . So I dont understand why other basic stuff like testo P. and deca should be underdosed and tren a is good, thats bullshit! Imho I dont trust the SIMEC tests on anaboliclab ? Now I must look how to dosage rolon. Always bad without real analyses ...
I've used SIMEC since 2014. We've "crossed checked" lab using (LC/MS/MS GC/MS) for testing powders...then sent finished product (oil) to SIMEC (HPLC). Both lab results were the same. It's not uncommon for underdosed gear....nice packaging or not.
Blood Work isn't an accurate way to determine mg/mL per Ampule/Vial
Shree products seem to be underdosed...some more than others
So you will still "feel" the effects....but you can't "feel" if it's 200mg/mL or 142.3mg/mL
The overdosed result (163mg/mL) from SC using GC-MS isn't accurate
(LC/MS/MS or GC/MS/MS or HPLC)
Are you the guy from muscletalk and the same from anaboliclab?
Yes mate, but I don't talk from bloodworks or somethin' . On another board a guy(definitely NO shree "friend") ordered a few samples and is testing it the next week , all with HPLC . Testo E and C already tested , both same a total of 210-230mg/ml. Let's see what comes out by the other results!
I don't feel difference between 200 and 142? , Sure I feel it . 3ml are not total 600mg , they have just 450 and this differnce I feel 4 sure. To the primo result I can't say anything... but 163mg/ml...chance that result with HPLC will be correct (100mg/ml) is big ;)
I thought I was "feeling" my Test/Tren/Mast blend......test result showed only Masteron......I was "feeling" "placebo". :))
But, if you can "feel" 200mg/mL compared to 143.2mg/mL.....I'll just start sending samples to you and save me some $$
SC Tested : (Compound Pharmacy)
Test E 200(250) mg/mL - 37.94 mg/mL
Test P 100 mg/mL - 125.4 mg/mL
I like SC....but they just aren't calibrated correctly for finished products yet:
https://www.eroids.com/pics/lab-result-comparisons-simec-steroidcheck-us...
They are not an accredited lab
As far as the Shree Underdosed Conspiracy....I have no clue. I don't use the product.
Hi bro, thanks for the reply.
Yes sometimes its placebo but I think I can feel a difference between 450 and 600 mg deca
What do you mean with :
"SC Tested : (Compound Pharmacy)
Test E 200(250) mg/mL - 37.94 mg/mL
Test P 100 mg/mL - 125.4 mg/mL"
Simec? So you think simec analyses are not correct or what?
Hope I understand u right mate...
SIMEC is an accredited lab
Steroid Check is not
I had sent some samples to "vett" SteroidCheck
The Test E and Test P samples were all over the board
My point about all this is:
Don't use SteroidChecks result to compare to SIMEC's Shree Test P (underdosed)
SC's results for finished products aren't accurate
I've communicated with the staff at SteroidCheck about using LC/MS/MS for better testing results.
The GC-MS is not accurate for (quantitative/ quantities of constituents) finished oils...for Powder (Intermediates) Purity % is Ok
Thank you.
As I wrote mate, this tests mean nothing to me... Thats my mind
I have primo batch SA-392. I haven't used that primo yet and rolon too but sust, cyp, prop, tren a was really good. Currently on PCT using Shree clomid. I'll find out about primo and deca spring time ...
Guys, I couldn't give a fuck whether people believe these results or not, I done this for my own piece of mind and just thought I'd share with you all.
I have read on here that Steroid Lab results differ from Simec, but as the results show 163mg I think I can safely assume it's not under-dosed even if not 100% accurate.
They state on their site that testing only takes 24-48 hours so shouldn't be a surprise testing was completed quickly. I also called them yesterday to confirm they'd received the sample as it was sent two weeks ago, they confirmed they'd just received it and will be testing so maybe my phone call prompted them.
Anyway, take from it what you will.
Great that you do the test bro but you didn't use hplc or? Other methods are always very inaccurate
Did you sent them rolon too mate? Thanks for the lab analyse
I don't think anyone is going against you brutha. I've sent samples here before. It takes time and is costly...so thanks for taking the time to test and share the results.
It's definitely Methenolone (Primo)
The mg/mL result is not as accurate as HPLC (SIMEC)
But, it's definely not bunk...and it is Primo.
Hi mate, thats right HPLC or UHPLC methods are very exactly , like simec use it. BUT who pays the analyses for anaboliclab , an analyse costs rouns 400$
No worries fella
rocketballzThis particular testing company has been called bs before just so you know.
musseldawg69Yeah I know
rocketballzAs HR said it appears there is primo in your bottles and that's a good thing. Enjoy
bigmurphWow not I'm really confused because I was going to but shree primo I saw anabolic lab and changed my mind fast but when did you buy these amps because I think shree pulled the overdose then underdose scam but time will tell.
Hitman187i really dont think they did that purposely, i mean i hope they wouldn't atleast. its so petty to do, especially with test when the raws are really cheap, it costs under $5 a bottle to produce. underdosing doesnt pay off in the long run, especially nowadays when we have several methods at our disposal to find out.
i just think they have poor quality control in place, most indian labs are notorious for this.
Hmmm...
You were able to get test results the next day? They test the gear the day they receive it? That's pretty nice of them.
Received 20th, tested 21st, emailed results 22nd.
I wasn't going against you. I don't know you from a hole in the wall and for all I know you're just trying to look out for us. I've looked into places to get stuff tested myself and they all seem to have a little wait after they receive the sample. The websites say 24-48 hours for results but that's when they actually get around to it. It just seemed weird to me that these guys got a sample in the mail and ran it the next day. That's almost unheard of with these companies. I didn't mean to start a shit storm on your thread and appreciate you paying to get a test done. Stay safe bro
No worries fella, just genuinely wanted to know what my gear contained and was willing to spend the cash to find out. No point keeping results to myself so best sharing with the community, all safer if we do this. Just seen a lot of shit on forums when people post results so was just making the point.
I called them yesterday to chase it up and they said they've just received it. A bit coincidental after 2 weeks posting so got a feeling it was already there before the 20th and I prompted them to test. So not likely that they did actually receive and test immediately imo.
Still not a reliable lab being that inaccurate anyway, whether under or over, even if not 100% accurate it's bound to be 130-140mg. In this case though I'll take the results happily lol
Maybe there's hope yet for shree +1 for testing
Every Shree product I've used has been very much in point , glad to see this as I have some also
have you tried rolon? if yes .. which batch bro?