So the scritropin is quality and good to go!? I've ran Brown and green top hyges. How do they compare?

Ok..... lets try to clear the air here.... The MW of HGH is HUGE.... because the molecule is actually a chain of molecules that are bound together. it is actually measured in Daltons. Then there are and can be isotopes which will affect and effect the MW. The reference MW is 22145 (I believe) and this was 125... so atomically very small. The bio availability of the compound is not affected. We can test several HGH samples and get readings all over.. within the "range" that defines HGH as a bio-active compound. As far as the 3.25mg..... i spoke to Dr in lab and he said "slightly" indicates less than 5% variation + or - from the stated value. So, if 3.25mg is SLIGHTLY overestimated, then %5 is .1625 APPROXIMATELY less thus giving 3.0875mg. So, in essence not a lot either. you can have the same variation within oral's as well. I will do my best to answer any and all questions I can. I am not a "guru" by any means, and need to consult with far wiser people than myself often. I do understand how the labs work and what value they bring. On a macro level, this HGH is good, active and legit. We have seen NON active HGH. We have seen HGH that was void of active HGH. I have seen HGH that was in the smaller peptides broken down from the long chain, so it DOES happen. Fischer is a laboratory reference standard HGH. There are others. It is quite expensive and is used as a benchmark, not as a measure.
Beaker

Wait so "the amount of 3.25mg per vial may be slightly over estimated" means that it is OVER dosed? Cause "over estimated" to me, means that whatever the lab "estimated" it at (3.25mg) was wrong and that they "over estimated" it, which in return, implies to me that 3.25mg per vial is not sufficient to what it really was and that they estimated it to be more than what it really is. In no way am I knocking Sciroxx or anyone I'm just interpreting what I read and I'm curious what exactly that meant. 96% purity looks good, but the molecular weight does not. If REAL HGH is 22145, and this HGH is 22125, doesn't that kinda make u go wtf? Like why on earth would the sample's molecular weight be entirely different than the baseline HGH's molecular weight? I was under the impression that MW of a compound is what it is... Black/white and no grey areas. For EXAMPLE ... Say the MW of sugar is 336.4 , then all sugar must be 336.4 right? And if you test some other brand of "sugar" and it comes out to 346.8, then you find out that's not sugar and instead Stevia which is a sugar alternative. That was just an example, and what I portray the molecular weight of something to mean... And if I'm wrong by all means tell me because I obviously do not know what I'm talking about, like I said these are just ideas I am assuming. The MW of something is the weight on a molecular level of the atoms and everything right? So if it was different from one sample to another would that mean those are two totally different things? Maybe similar, but not exactly the same? OR I am incorrect and the MW of a compound can vary slightly from one to another depending on a number of variables. Kinda just thinking out loud here lol. I know it has to be real because u guys say its going good, but I can't help but be curious about the MW thing

+1

Right on. Thank you Mex for throwin down the cash , And having faith in Karl. And Thank you Beaker for putting your time and effort out for all of us guys here. We appreciate it.

+1

Impressive!

I am glad we were able to help. Word of mouth and rep go a long way..... BUT.... this puts the proof in the pudding!
Beaker

Good work Sexy! Great contribution!

Good stuff G! Thx for the info. +1

Bam! Good job way to look out for everyone!!! +1

This is great I might be able to afford some actual HGH. Way to go Sciroxx.

Very nice! I'm a long term HGH user. Sciroxx has a great reputation and this just confirms it even more. Thanks for sharing the result with the eRoids family. +1sexy