+ 4 B1001HG Green Top Jintropin
Hey guys just a heads up, these are not from “sample” batches. These mass spectrum lab results are from the exact powder that we use to make the products out of. It would defeat the purpose and totally make the lab results irrelevant. My man Beaker can vouch for this because he know how much we get tested. If that “were” true then why wouldn’t I wait for a sample that tests greater than 90%? However if you look at all the test you will see they range from the mid 50’s to the mid 90’s. I do this because I want the customer to know we are doing our very best to ensure that you are getting exactly what you paid for. Bottom line is no matter where you are getting your powders whether it be, China, India, Poland, etc… They are all the same. If a source is not testing the raw material that the whole product is based on then what guarantee do you, the customer have when purchasing from them? You don’t have anything other than their label. Sorry there isn’t some Holy Grail of raw powder sources. Those of you that are doing nothing but hate on this system to make is seem disreputable should sit back and think what you have done for the community. Oh yeah, that’s right, you have done absolutely nothing.
Lab results by Beaker
- Bookmark
- 4
- 0
Are you referring to the "US raws" statements banner? Lol
Edit +1 by the way.
Dr. BannerWith mass spectrum you want to look at the percentage.
JoosemanI wouldn't go off purity for HGH. Recent mass specs posted showed Hyges at 95% pure I believe and the Serum Test was <14. I would go the extent when dealing with the sketchy GH business. The Hyges mass spec also stated it had >0.3mg of HGH present in each vial, and still tested out as very sub par.
why are you knocking a source for lab testing his products? Is it wrong he wants to make sure his products are real and pure? I don't understand the purpose of putting him down for it.
JoosemanPlease show me where I "knocked a source" if you read posts below I commended him on actually testing. am i not allowed to make a relation with other testing and show more intelligence than saying "AWESOME BRO!" made a suggestion, and a relation. Didn't say a single bad thing as I support testing 150% Been around a hell of a lot longer and seen more than you'll ever understand bud. Jins haven't tested good in years.. I'd love to see a source choose the other 2 options they had tested (rips/hyges) rather than losing 5-10k on an order that could have been prevented if someone spent $50 to get another test done. Start using your head and reading before you start telling me what Im doing. Beyond all, this is disrespectful to even have on their lab reports. Everything I posted before was relative facts when it comes to HGH.
Dr. BannerI love how you continually comment on my labs to refute them rather than to agree that I am doing something for the community that no one has done before. Since you know so much how about I pay you to test my raws
JoosemanOh no, I can make my text colored too. don't be getting butt hurt guy, I didn't "refute" your labs in the slightest. I think its good that you have tests done. I keep trying to make people question why they would buy from all these other top sources who haven't submitted a single test for the community.. its bullshit IMO. Merely making a connection the testing and HGH which would save ya money before you buy a bunch of bunk growth since it is "high purity." Blue tops test as high purity as well, but they're still garbage when it comes to GH serum/IGF. I can show you multiple sources mass spec testing their GH and the serum testing coming back at numbers you wouldn't think of buying BULK of.
How important are the actual blood serum numbers? Rips always seem to test in the 40's whereas I've seen pharma hgh test in the 20's but I don't see many people arguing that rips are better than pharma.
JoosemanYou'd never hear that out of my mouth bro.. I should elaborate
people do a quick serum test just to prove its real HGH.. if its bunk, the serum number will be null, or very small. You aren't going to find IGF elevation if the HGH serum is 0.01. But without a doubt, IGF is the true indicator of quality HGH. Something that raises IGF far outweighs a serum number IMO.
A serum test is just a quick way to tell the GH isn't bunk, which the mass spec tests don't really justify.
So you really need the mass spec along with IGF and the blood serum to get a true read on things but the IGF takes a while to build in your system right?
Anyway, props to Banner for putting all this shit out there and making things easier on us.
Joosemanyes the IGF does (build) but even at a 10IU IM injection, you should be elevated well beyond normal ranges..
in a perfect world, a mass spec, 10IU IM serum test, and a IGF test after several weeks would show a complete profile on the HGH. If I had to rank them in order of importance, I'd say:
Thanks, appreciate the feedback bro.
Wow so out of the 3 tested, these scores the highest. I guess jins are coming along.
The purity is higher but the amount of hgh in the vial was only .2mg, which is half of the other two tested. But, I'm not sure if beaker performed all test with a whole 10iu vial or only samples from each vial.
WithdrawlYeah, I'm thinking it's just because of the amount of sample Beaker used. I always thought there is suppossed to be 3.3mg per vial.