BFG's picture
BFG
  • 2.4k
  • ADM
3922

+ 8 Sources begging for votes, users begging for gear

ad

This violates our rules, but more importantly has the potential to screw up our ranking system. I'm not going to let you do that. High or low ranking, vets or newbies, you will get yourself banned and sources will be penalized.

Nitti's picture

Bump

manbearpig's picture

is there an appropriate way to ask for sponsorship in the next ebc or should that be avoided?

Nitti's picture

Typically guys just approach sources. But with the new guidelines ,let us go over it and get back to you.

manbearpig's picture

Thanks Nitti

Greg's picture

There are a couple of things to remember that would keep people honest...

You are worth more to the source than the source is to you.

If you're above reproach, you increase your worth. And other reputable sources may seek you out.

You should be getting blood work anyway. If you keep telling yourself you can't afford it, this is your opportunity. Blood work will remove bias where it counts the most. and makes the review a no brainer.

Always let others know in your review that you are reviewing a promo.

When in doubt when an offer is made in PM ask a mod.

Pepwarehouse's picture

I see what you are getting at about rating a source on more that 1 or 2 products but for most of us that would never happen. I know that I haven't ran every product from a source and probably never will. I believe I can judge a product within a couple weeks but then again I've ran all short esters and some orals. When it comes to the 10-15 whatever reviews I've written over the past almost 2 years they are 95% short ester test/mast/tren/tne/dbol/anadrol/viagra/cialis/ai's. So as far as that goes its pretty easy to get that many reviews in. I've only made a couple large orders. I prefer to keep em smaller since I'm not ballin' by any means. There's been quite a few of these little free promos also and if you partake it is your responsibility to write a review whether its positive or not. I guess those have added up over time.

Pepwarehouse's picture

you should be able to get a feel for just about every oral, ai's and short ester in less than a month....

Pale's picture

I was just reading thru your reviews. good stuff

Pale's picture

And yes, I was being sarcastic...

Pepwarehouse's picture

The only long esters I have in stash are test e/ eq(which i waited like 10 weeks or longer to review)/deca and tren e(both never used yet) I just like fat acting compounds cause you know quickly if they're good or not... things like tne/viagra,ect you know in hours

Nitti's picture

I have a big ass Ban hammer ready and waiting!

White Bolt's picture

so no more free gear for honest review promos? hmmm

Nitti's picture

The reviews aren't honest when the source asks for 10 stars and the member obliges because he/she feels obligated!

Darktide's picture

I agree with Nov! I believe it can be supported with the fact that many times we see sources get unwavering support from others even when some guy is getting the run around from a source on getting his order. I believe many here would and could not have there integrity bought but I also believe many could.

Greg's picture

Yes.
Could the review be an honest 5x10 stars inspite of the "coercion"? Yes

But more importantly would you want ANY question of impropriety when making a decision about a source. Or, for that matter, as a source, would you want anyone to question the integrity of you or your gear?

Best for all parties to keep all cards on the table; no backroom deals.

Think about it, what motivation is there for a "gear for votes" promo if your gear and service can stand on its own?

Greg's picture

I don't agree. If I go into a supermarket and get a free sample of a hot pocket I might spit it out in disgust and not give it another thought, or I might buy some and tell my friends about this great new product I discovered at the store. That's not skewed perception, that's honest advertising.

If I was a "paid" sponsor, (which is what gear for votes amounts to), I will profess the greatness of the product irrespective of my true feelings for it.

Greg's picture

It all boils down to integrity; I agree.

bloods show "quality" is good, perhaps overdosed, PIP is high; 8 stars
pricing average for the quality; 7 stars
service sucked -odd because of the promo; 3 stars
delivery, as promised.: 10 stars

Total score: 28
Comments: I was surprised I got such poor service being that he was sending me a promo for his product.
The gear caused severe PIP in my delt, not so much in my glute. Overall I'd use him again if his service improved.

Greg's picture

That's not what he said.

Wrong: give me 5x10 stars and I'll give you free gear
Wrong: give me free gear and I'll give you 5x10 stars and talk you up.

Right: I'm sure you'll love my gear, try it for free, all I ask is that you'd post an honest review afterwards.
Right: Fathers Day sale. One free bottle of test-e for every 2 purchased.
Right: This is a large order, are you able to offer me some sort of discount?

HydeMind's picture

Nice analogys

HydeMind's picture

They are both an analogy is an example explaining a similar phenomenon.

HydeMind's picture

This has all surpassed my high school English skills.

Pale's picture

Ain't nothing in this world for free....

Catalyst's picture

Well said BFG. Happening too often.

More by BFG