You cold try and collect igf/gh testing numbers as well any janoshik testing for purity and collate into 1 big spread sheet. I don't really see another way to do any sort of ranking as these would be the only real hard numbers you could have to work with. It would be a ton of work though.

I like the idea, and it seems to be in keeping with the purpose of this site, but there are challenges making it unlikely. 1st, various batches of HGH will have different quality parameters so new batches would need to be tested thoroughly each time & verified somehow 3rd party. 2nd, we would need to assign value to various parameters like dimer content, purity, dosing accuracy, etc. Then of course, there is personal response among users. Then after this, we’d need to assign value to the service of the source. Is it lyophilized or liquid? Is it the new long form? It would be a serious undertaking. This site as it is, is probably the best resource to research reviews, tests & source offers and use your own discernment.

Dear God... How old are you? This post makes me think your mind is still developing... ITS LITERALLY RANKED 1-10

I’m not sure if I am reading this correctly but can’t you just rank them in the review area by using the search filter to select HGH and the manufacturer? From there you can use stars to “rank” your experience.

I honestly don't think there is a way to rank them. Everyone has their favorite and reacts a little differently. Its liek asking who has the best pizza. You are going to get 20 different answers.

Some simple searches you can see who the top GH sources people discuss. Try em out and see for yourself. For me personally I haven't seen much difference between the 2-3 sources I have used.