Yes, I agree that it'd be better to include IGF-1 too, but what I don't agree with the "cheap peptides" part. I think it's probably was relevant 15 years ago, when Big Pharm. HGH was the only source of quality HGH with smaller labs making their first steps into the HGH scene. I doubt it's even cost effective to use some "peptides" instead of real HGH nowadays.
Also, IGF-1 and HGH are working separately from each other, our fat has HGH receptors, while our muscles/bones have IGF-1 receptors. I can elaborate more on the subject in our SRC thread
Would you like me to say just peptides then. Been here long enough to see countless bunk HGH that was faked with peps. IGF is the only reliable indicator. Always great to know GH levels as well but IGF score is what determines the real deal now. I think it has gotten a lot better, like you said, but you never know when a source, especially new ones without any street cred, may try and pull a fast one.
Thanks for the info. In the previous test I did this IM. For the IGF-1 test, when using the normal daily dose 3 hours ahead of time, would you do IM or SubQ?
Thanks for testing brother+1
Good sign but next time get IGF tested. GH can be elevated just from cheap peptides. IGF response is really what we are looking for now.
Yes, I agree that it'd be better to include IGF-1 too, but what I don't agree with the "cheap peptides" part. I think it's probably was relevant 15 years ago, when Big Pharm. HGH was the only source of quality HGH with smaller labs making their first steps into the HGH scene. I doubt it's even cost effective to use some "peptides" instead of real HGH nowadays.
Also, IGF-1 and HGH are working separately from each other, our fat has HGH receptors, while our muscles/bones have IGF-1 receptors. I can elaborate more on the subject in our SRC thread
RS
Would you like me to say just peptides then. Been here long enough to see countless bunk HGH that was faked with peps. IGF is the only reliable indicator. Always great to know GH levels as well but IGF score is what determines the real deal now. I think it has gotten a lot better, like you said, but you never know when a source, especially new ones without any street cred, may try and pull a fast one.
Good advice. Will do, thanks.
No need to pin 10iu when testing your IGF. Just pin your normal daily dose and try to time blood test 3hrs after that.
Thanks for the info. In the previous test I did this IM. For the IGF-1 test, when using the normal daily dose 3 hours ahead of time, would you do IM or SubQ?
No need for IM if you usually pin sub q. If your normal routine is IM though, stick with what you normally do.