I dont necessarily recommend this but due to being in a bind I once ran ment as my test base with anavar for 6 weeks. I felt great and looked good too.
When I run ment and test together I am the horniest person ever. Never had a problem with estrogen conversion from ment.
Well according to "research" ment could be used as a test base but we all know nothing can substitute for test as a test base....nothing. I'd like to see an actual live study comparing both instead of paper comparisons
If you look at this dude called more plates more dates he actually did a test with running ment in replacement as test for trt is was more for comparing hair loss but I'm pretty sure he did blood work after and stuff. He also does injectable lgd 4033 and estrodiol in replacement of trt and had bloodwork done after to compare. He does alot of experiments. He also has a line of pre workouts that are pretty good called gorilla mode
Derrick(more plates) def does some interesting things. He seems to be one of the more trustworthy influencers these days.
The only thing I didn't like about his ment experiment as TRT is he only did it for a month. I feel it would have been a lot more trustworthy if he used it for a longer period of time to ensure no issues on down the road.
Exactly. Thats why I would never come on here recommending it as a test base without it being better solidified as a viable replacement with human studies.
I have been playing with both MENT and Tren this year to try to figure out if all the MENT hype is true about strength and size gains - & I will still have to say Tren wins by a mile. I know it shouldn't do on paper, but it does. I swear a lot of it is to do with the way trenbolone strengthens tendons. I wish the Ment was more effective as it is way less destructive too!
Yeah I've ran ment in the past, it's definately overrated I will say that. I still enjoy it because it's stronger than alot of aas and I don't get those terrible e2 problems from it but it's just so expensive. If I was to run it again I will only buy the 100mg version because 50 is too much oil daily and too expensive. I'm actually thinking of saving up my money to try this exact cycle dhb and ment and a small amount of test obviously but I am tight with money so it will probably have to wait for a while.
It's strange seeing those prices cause I remember when Ment was sold long ago as a research chemical it wasn't expensive at all and it was lab tested and real. I clearly remember a 20ml vial at 50mg/mL selling for $32.99. That's a fact. So price per gram shot up tremendously. I remember hearing about dhb, ment, Sdrol and a few more "new anabolics" years ago and yet I see srcs are just now getting these steroids and the prices are high now, back then prices were dirt cheap.
Yeah ment raws are like the same as primo if.not even more. And yeah it started as a RC, it still is a legal compound for research purposes. But it like slowly started gaining popularity when someone put all the false information online that it's a crazy bulker 5x the strength of tren and that you need to inject it 3x daily lol. Someone started those rumors and it spread like wildfire and alot of people buy it in hopes of gaining crazy size. It's not a bad compound but it's nothing like what it says about it online haha. Ide run it more often if it weren't so expensive and more available in the 100mg/mL option.
Well the thing is if it's pure Ment you don't need 100mg/mL. And I agree the anabolic ratings on Ment isn't totally true. Inject 3x daily they said? That shouldn't of been the case being it was in acetate form. But again man I'm still shocked how the raws for ment shot up that high to primo level. Damn
Yeah the first time I ran ment I had 100mg but I think it was underdosed cuz I ended up running close to 100mg daily but you should really only need 50mg for advanced users but I just like the 100mg so it's less oil daily. And yeah that's what I don't get either 3x a day is something with no ester.
Yep it is EXTREMELY expensive for what you get even if you don't require much due to it being so strong! $90 for 50mg/ml or $180 for 100mg/ml per vial - For that price it should be adding 10lb's to bench each and every week LMAO
I would have snagged the 100mg ment
Rustyhookerhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204340/
Amazing what real research shows. Super harsh shutdown though so suggest my listed pcts.
GunShow22inNice little grab.
I dont necessarily recommend this but due to being in a bind I once ran ment as my test base with anavar for 6 weeks. I felt great and looked good too.
When I run ment and test together I am the horniest person ever. Never had a problem with estrogen conversion from ment.
Let me know how this goes.
Well according to "research" ment could be used as a test base but we all know nothing can substitute for test as a test base....nothing. I'd like to see an actual live study comparing both instead of paper comparisons
If you look at this dude called more plates more dates he actually did a test with running ment in replacement as test for trt is was more for comparing hair loss but I'm pretty sure he did blood work after and stuff. He also does injectable lgd 4033 and estrodiol in replacement of trt and had bloodwork done after to compare. He does alot of experiments. He also has a line of pre workouts that are pretty good called gorilla mode
Yea he's a interesting guy. Alot of experiments.
GunShow22inDerrick(more plates) def does some interesting things. He seems to be one of the more trustworthy influencers these days.
The only thing I didn't like about his ment experiment as TRT is he only did it for a month. I feel it would have been a lot more trustworthy if he used it for a longer period of time to ensure no issues on down the road.
Your right, now I remember, like i said it was more for hair loss comparison that experiment. I thought he did it longer than that.
GunShow22inExactly. Thats why I would never come on here recommending it as a test base without it being better solidified as a viable replacement with human studies.
Yeah you were in a bind so I understood your comment. Ment has its place though I think.
GunShow22inAgreed!
Now you got me thinking about hoping on some ment.
Let me know how that ment is. I'm gonna be ordering some eventually
I have been playing with both MENT and Tren this year to try to figure out if all the MENT hype is true about strength and size gains - & I will still have to say Tren wins by a mile. I know it shouldn't do on paper, but it does. I swear a lot of it is to do with the way trenbolone strengthens tendons. I wish the Ment was more effective as it is way less destructive too!
Yeah I've ran ment in the past, it's definately overrated I will say that. I still enjoy it because it's stronger than alot of aas and I don't get those terrible e2 problems from it but it's just so expensive. If I was to run it again I will only buy the 100mg version because 50 is too much oil daily and too expensive. I'm actually thinking of saving up my money to try this exact cycle dhb and ment and a small amount of test obviously but I am tight with money so it will probably have to wait for a while.
It's strange seeing those prices cause I remember when Ment was sold long ago as a research chemical it wasn't expensive at all and it was lab tested and real. I clearly remember a 20ml vial at 50mg/mL selling for $32.99. That's a fact. So price per gram shot up tremendously. I remember hearing about dhb, ment, Sdrol and a few more "new anabolics" years ago and yet I see srcs are just now getting these steroids and the prices are high now, back then prices were dirt cheap.
Yeah ment raws are like the same as primo if.not even more. And yeah it started as a RC, it still is a legal compound for research purposes. But it like slowly started gaining popularity when someone put all the false information online that it's a crazy bulker 5x the strength of tren and that you need to inject it 3x daily lol. Someone started those rumors and it spread like wildfire and alot of people buy it in hopes of gaining crazy size. It's not a bad compound but it's nothing like what it says about it online haha. Ide run it more often if it weren't so expensive and more available in the 100mg/mL option.
Well the thing is if it's pure Ment you don't need 100mg/mL. And I agree the anabolic ratings on Ment isn't totally true. Inject 3x daily they said? That shouldn't of been the case being it was in acetate form. But again man I'm still shocked how the raws for ment shot up that high to primo level. Damn
Yeah the first time I ran ment I had 100mg but I think it was underdosed cuz I ended up running close to 100mg daily but you should really only need 50mg for advanced users but I just like the 100mg so it's less oil daily. And yeah that's what I don't get either 3x a day is something with no ester.
Yep it is EXTREMELY expensive for what you get even if you don't require much due to it being so strong! $90 for 50mg/ml or $180 for 100mg/ml per vial - For that price it should be adding 10lb's to bench each and every week LMAO
ShanntellsloverNice vials