posted Tue, 01/31/2017 - 21:43
2525
SARMS
ad
Anyone in here try sarms? I was thinking of doing a stack of LGD/MK 677/Ostarine/GW, then I went and looked at the prices and turned my cpu off... I can't believe how expensive that shit is. Just curious if anyone has ran any cycles and how they compared to running AAS.
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
I run them on a cruise dose of test as a bridge.
S4 is good at 80mg. LGD at 40mg
mk677 is very good stacked with cjc DAC for 6months.
They are too expensive, less powerful than roids and also cause supression. I never tried them, but what I learned about them puts me off. I also read some are even carcinogenic
I’d have to respectfully disagree with the statement that SARMs are ineffective and expensive. With the right stack at moderate dosages accompanied by a quality caloric surplus and intense training, you can easily achieve gains comparable to AAS. I would add RAD-140 to the stack you mentioned above and run them all. Keep in mind MK-677 and GW are not SARMs. MK is an IGF-1 secretagogue which is going to amplify the effects of LGD, Osta and RAD, and GW is a PPAR agonist which is going to burn fat, boost endurance and help with nutrient partitioning. I ran a product called KONG by Medfit-RX for a little over 8 weeks which consists of Ostarine 25mg, GW 20mg, MK-677 15mg, LGD 10mg, and RAD 6mg. I upped the dose by 50% at 4 weeks and put on a total of 18lbs lean mass. No side effects, very little suppression. Anyone that says SARMs are ineffective is either running the wrong ones, fake ones, or slacking in the areas of training and/or diet. SARMs are no joke.
LGD is ok, Osta is Ok. Best of the SARMS though is S4 when cutting, if you don't mind seeing yellow. MK 677 and GW, spend your money elsewhere imo. Most SARMS are not really worth it when you can run an AAS cycle instead. Cost/benefit ratio just isn't there. Now if you are not looking to dip your toes into the AAS world, then SARMS are your next best bet, but plan not to be overly wowed by them. Better than GNC though. Personally, I'll take creatine and IGF/HGH over SARMS anyday.
s4 80 mg a day shredded me pretty good and liver values stayed healthy
Gotcha, I first started taking designers when I was 18(very very dumb)... Been doing like 1 cycle a year since. M1T, Superdrol, Mdrol, Hdrol, Msten, Epistane.....Then did the newer weaker Andros.. I'm just now finishing my first 12 week Test E run at 400mg. I love it.. I guess I was just wondering where to look to next.. But I think at this point, I should stop trying new things and simply go with what worked and what my body agreed with. I'll probably do another Test Run next year along with an oral kickstart..
I guess the prices on the SARMS just really aren't worth bothering with..
I also have no idea about IGF and HGH. I'd have to do more research.
Thanks for your comment.
BandoleroPm me when you get a chance
I have been extremely disappointed in OSTARINE,,used it a few times in various dosages and just wasn't pleased.
RustyhookerHave you read the sarm groups info? Join it. Lots there
Tried Ostarine, LGD, and S4. With test and Ostarine, nothing special. With test, Ostarine, LGD, and S4 there were noticeable gains but nowhere near what could have been accomplished with more test (and less $). I will say that there is benefit when cutting. With Ostarine, S4, LGD, and low test dose: was able to hold on to muscle and strength with low calories very well.
BandoleroI have and I like certain ones. I would only run S4 or S23 along with SR9009 and GW. S4 and S23 would go well with a steroid cycle as a substitute for cutters like winstrol. I would love to run winny but my prostate and hair line wont accept it.
From my personal experience save ur money IV ran a cycle of ostarine and lgd and pretty much nothing came of it. Have u cycled aas before? If so u better just stick to that