4johnybravo's picture
4johnybravo
  • 19
1703

WHY no usa UG HGH LABS?

ad

Why is it we only had like 4 underground hgh labs in the usa, in the past 5 yrs? i know thier "IP" BUT his shit wasnt near what riptropins are. We have like 30 USA domestic UG labs for any androgen in the world. but no UG labs utilizing the easiest,cleansest, and highest yeilding production of Rhgh thru "mouse cell secretion"
THe first guy to produce hgh in a UG lab thru mouse cell secretion and doses the vials correctly, equal to riptropins, will be a multi millionaire FAST.

4johnybravo's picture

accually, if they wanna mke hgh via e-coli it isnt. from what ive looked into, a profesor of bio genetics i know in st louis said, that one, an hgh undergraound lab, that could produce a decent amount of hgh could fit into a small room. 2 their are several companys on the internet that sell e.coli specifically for use in makeing Rhgh, ive contacted one of them. they not only sell one pound of e.coli for 300@$ they can also sell you a replicating vat to produce your own, now you need incubator vats to mix the e.coli with the cloned rhgh gene, the hardest part is replicating the rghgh gene, you must isolate it then duplicate it, but thier are companys that sell that as well, 3 you mix the gene with the e.coli, not all the e.coli will take the gene, and some will produce 192amino, for this reagents which i do not know the names of are used to filter the e.coli,and other impurities out, im pretty sure its just pouring the reagents into the vats, and skimming off the top the impurities. i think the equipment would cost 30,000$, you then also need a freeze drying machine, which coule run 8k, for a small good model. it can no doubt be done on a small scale, one UG lab could produce enouph to supply two Bodybuilding forum communities very high quality Rhgh if one man would step up and be an entrepenuer. but... if i could just find riptropins for a 1.50$ i wouldnt be wineing at all....

the best way to make Rhgh is Mouse cell secretion technology which requires less product, less reagents to filter, and produces a far higher quality. so e.coli method is out dated yet still usable.

4johnybravo's picture

anyone?