posted Tue, 07/23/2019 - 02:04
2384
-1 SARMS
ad
Anyone had luck with SARMS for strength gains? Do they show up on drug tests the same way test ect would?
- Bookmark
- 0
- 1
Anyone had luck with SARMS for strength gains? Do they show up on drug tests the same way test ect would?
I did 8 weeks of lgd, I was fine after.
8 weeks of rad, I felt the need for pct.
Everyone is different though.. Both from proven peptides..
I used 10mg of RAD-140 for 3 weeks then 10mg of LGD for three weeks while on a base of 250mg Test E per week. I saw good gains from both for that dosage and no real noticeable side effects in addition to what Test alone would give you. I was also using 20mg of MK-677 over this entire time.
anyone has experience with injectable sarms ?
CibaReally injectable sarms? Might aswell go ahead and just inject test -.-'
CibaLGD was pretty good. At 10mg a day with some test e amazing strenght gains. Ran solo it will suppres you somewhat. Not as much as full on gear ofcourse.
Only way it would pop would be an anti-doping Test specifically looking for PEDs. All SARMs can be detected in urine in a PED Test.
No one tests for SARMS. SARMS can give you results depending on which ones you choose and what your goals are. However, they aren't like AAS for strength. They are better used for recovery, injuries etc.
They test for sarms in a drug tested sporting event, especially if they’re going by WADA standards. They test for all PEDs.
The OP should stop trying to cheat and do an untested meet like a man. Or maybe he’s afraid he won’t be able to compete when the rest of the guys are on too...
100% correct on testing. There is no test that just looks for aas and not SARMs. The test they use looks for ALL peds. MK-677 and GW501516 are not steroids or SARMs and they still show up as well.
CibaHow is gw501516 going to show up on a blood test though? It's not a stimulant, not a sarm it's not even hormonal.
I’m not a chemist so I honestly can’t say what they’re looking for related to that chemical. But I am 100% positive they look for because of the endurance increase that it gives people. Just something else to consider, caffeine also shows up on the test. You’re not going to be disqualified for it, but it’s an example of how everything shows up.
It’s still a drug. That’s like saying how can they test for Advil. Or Percocet. Or anything for that matter.
If it’s on the PED list they test for it
CibaIs it? I don't know too much about the make up of gw. But I've read about cases that people have been tested positive for it. So it's interesting to know what they are looking for.
Back when I lacked education in SARMS I over looked them. After doing more and more research I found them very interesting because of how effective they are.
GW Was the first one I used and I was absolutely blown away at how much endurance it gave me. I was shocked at how effective it was.
CibaYeah I was also really impressed by both gw and lgd. Gw gives you such a clean endurance boost, no jitters no crash or feeling wired. Lgd gave me amazing fullness when included in a test cycle, it actually deepend my voice when on it which no other compounds that I've tried really do atleast not as noticeable. A friend of mine asked me if I had caught a cold lol.
I dig. Yea they can test you for any compound. And as soon as the agencies find out about one athletes are using for a leg up they throw it on the list. Think about it, they can test to see how much potassium is in your blood, why not any other chemical, you know?
CibaYeah that makes sense, they'll go after anything that can give you an edge in competition.
I’d imagine EPO and PCT meds are on that list as well. At least it is in baseball. Shit, Manny Ramirez got popped for HCG
Yep when I've been on I competed untested and do well. I want to start doing tested. I always get pissed because everyone knows something about someone and politics claiming things lol
If you wanna start doing tested then why still take shit?
You clearly DONT want to start doing tested then. You’re trying to pretend your doing tested and find loop holes to still have an advantage. If you wanna do tested then why not go clean and see how you really do? Even still you’ve already used so you’ve done some permanent alterations that still give you an advantage, but a year off is fair.
What’s the point? So you can feel good about yourself beating guys who don’t use? I don’t see the point. Just a dick move to still use PEDs and compete in a tested sport. If there were no untested events/federations (baseball, football, etc) I’d get it, but if you have options you’re just being a dick by using anything
Okay that makes sense. I don't know much about them AAS is where I'm knowledgeable and I hear things here and there about SARMS so it peaked my curiosity!