posted Fri, 03/01/2019 - 11:13
1195
TWO DIFF SOURCES!
ad
What's up guys, I'm just curious to see how you guys feel about blood work from guys that run products from diff labs at the same time? I've noticed some guys run from sources that Seem to always have Good numbers and also run from labs that rarely have Good numbers, can those numbers be trusted when they pull bloods.... Who's to say which lab was good and which was bunk?
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
ClassyChassisI would hope most people would have enough sense not to try and draw conclusions from something with said ambiguity
If you run one labs tren, anothers dbol and a 3rd labs Test E
those bloods will still only tell you about the Test E
The other shit dont show up on bloods
What reason would anyone have to pin multiple sources of test?
Just a hypothetical. You are going to run a cycle including Test E or C. Lab A has good reviews on their Test E/C, so you buy some. Just to get your Test levels up high quickly until the E/C kicks in, you run some Test P from Lab B because Lab A doesn't sell it. Or, you have some Test E/C from Lab A left over from your last cycle but it's not enough for your next full cycle. Lab B comes up with a promo, so you buy from them. They are not unreasonable scenarios.
changing from test p to test e will make the bloodwork less than accurate for either one.
Just saying that there is no good reason to bounce from source a test to source b test.
Mixing in source b tren, deca etc wont matter as they dont show on bloods.
RustyhookerAgree ^^^^. You wont get accurrate readings without proper separation in time or brand.
It's simple math. Just follow this example of mine when I was doing a review using Test-A from one source and Test-C and Boldenone from another. Just modify my formula by entering the values of A, B, and C to reflect the amounts you are using.
Lol. I do in fact understand these formulas as well as your clever arithmetic used to manipulate Einstein's theory of relativity: time and space. You could have easily solved your problem by substituting your variables by plugging them into this simple algebraic formula: y=mx+b. Lol. Oh man. This one has me laughing. Made my day man
{x|x>9000}
x such as x = OVER 9000!!!
-b±√(b^2-4ac)÷2a. (x^2 = x squared) For example, x^2+2x-3≤9000. -b being the lowest point on the Y axis. This quadratic formula is much easier to solve for X. No need for Leniar equations. Thought that this might help a bit.
hahaha
ClassyChassisPure gold right there
Then take that formula and divide it over a slice of PI.... Bon Appetit!
RustyhookerAh la mode?
Laissez les bon temps rouler! Cajun country sayings... lol
Get-bigShiiiit lol
There is no way to accurately determine which lab is doing what. The only thing you can go by is how you react after using the product from each lab. If one is far superior over period of time you would tend to notice.
Get-bigYou're right big dawg...
This is a very good question. I run from 3 labs at once and sometimes I wonder what is doing what. I can pin 1000mg test a week but not feel it but my muscles get so huge so I figure something is working right. But maybe I'm pinning grapeseed oil. I guess the key is sides being under control
RustyhookerEq from fred and test from joe. Sure!
Get-bigI've just been seeing it and in a way it gives credit to sources that may not deserve it because they tag both sources when they draw bloods.... I know they're suppose to but it Often makes sources that aren't so good look like gold!
You have to read between the lines. Using two different sources at the same time you can't come to any conclusions about either source. Both could be good or one good and one bad. You have no clue so you can't come to a conclusion about either source and trying to do so would be foolish. Meaningless concerning the sources except you at least know yourself that your cycle is on track.
Get-bigYou're right big dawg..
eeny meeny miny moe
Get-bigI wish that actually worked lol
LOL likewise!
The Law of Averages. Ha.
Get-bigIt sucks because it gives some sources credit they may not deserve!