posted Wed, 06/17/2015 - 07:33
1677
Negative Effects of running test only cycle for 21 weeks ?
ad
Just curious what the negative effects of running test e for 21 weeks as opposed to stoping at 12 would be running at 600 mg per week ?
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
Thx for everyone's advice but I'm not running this I'm running 450 test e and I'm only going 13 weeks lol this was honestly just a curiosity thing but thx everyone for the info !!
For being reasonable +2 (Hope you're telling the truth).
RustyhookerGuys below dropped a ton if great info on running the calender. And that's real talk! Healthy and max a year over the gimme now ideals.
another reason is that on cycle you will get to a point where regardless of food and gym changes, the growth stops. Just like any drug, the returns drop. Remember when 1 beer was good...then 6 pack...then jack daniels? Rate of diminishing returns! Then you quit drinking for 6 months and you're back to a couple beers and you're hammered.
Why grab the jack when a 6 pack gets it done?
I personally don't think you'll see any advantage to running that long of a test cycle. If you're not prone to estrogen related sides. I'm almost willing to bet that you will be after running a 21 week cycle at 600mgs. Standard protocol as I am sure you know is 500mgs for 10 to 12 weeks. So you're on the higher end. Plus don't forget that test will thicken your blood which will cause your heart to have to pump harder which may very well require you to be on blood pressure meds. Just stick to the normal run of the mill cycle. With proper diet and training you will have no need to run a 21 week cycle of test.
Two things to consider.
Firstly, time off equals time on +pct, so if you run 21 wks, 2 was until pct, then a 5 or 6 wk October (which WILL be more asvisable than a 4 wk due to the length of cycle), that's 29 wks until you can run again. Over 6 months. Are you going to wait that long? Judging by your "I'm acquiring gear now", I'm guessing no chance. Then, the next point becomes even more valid.
Secondly, recovery will be tougher, less predictable and likely less successful. At 30 years old, your natural test production may not bounce back after that period of time, or possibly reduced if you're fortunate. Keep doing it with insufficient time off, your natural test production isn't going to keep bouncing back.
Thx for the info man I have no prob waiting not actually obtaining the gear just getting info on where to start and what I'm going to do my cycle right now is 450 test e per week ends in 4 weeks 13 weeks long .. I have pct nolva /clomid how long do you recommend waiting to start next cycle like I said I feel good and am cutting nicely but I deff feel more test would have given me much better results is why I wanted to go with 600 mg per week next cycle
I just feel great and was wondering why people don't run longer cycles
its a bad idea because of the shutdown. This is your 1st cycle so keep it short and simple. Running that high an amount over 12 weeks will give you nothing but a longer road to recovery. Not worth it.
I'm not doing this I'm just curious that's all I'm only on my first cycle getting great gains and awesome loss in body fat % I'm 6ft 1 210lbs 12-13 % bf I'm on test e only now but plan on staring new cycle in no acguiring gear now but just trying I further my knowledge
DeathstrokeJust go to a doctor or endo for trt
What in the flying fuck does that have to do with his question? I negged you because you threw something on the wall without any explanation or reason.
DeathstrokeSorry I just thought if he wanted to be on test that long just go to a doctor get his levels checked and get on trt and cruise. I think that would be more safer than 600mg a week of a random ugl brand.
But I do agree with everything Flash posted.
no worries.
all good man, just gotta check stats and cycle history, trt is not something recommended, i know what your saying but yeah not the best advice man. gave ya points back.
DeathstrokeGot it, I understand, still learning
???? why? just why?. smh. 30 yo on first cycle? why ???
Why ? Why is that bad ? I been training for over 2years and just hit a dead stop couldn't cut right wasn't putting mass on either now on my first cycle body is getting ripped lost huge fat chunks throughout my body I just couldn't get rid off and even on my cutting diet I'm still getting larger . Is this to young not being rude just curious to your opinion is all
i was reffering to other guy telling you trt.
and yes it is bad, slow the fuck down and run a normal proper cycle,pct- time on plus time off then new cycle if needed, just stick to the recommended cycle length, 12 weeks.
https://www.eroids.com/forum/steroids-qa/steroid-cycles/ok-new-1st-cycle
https://www.eroids.com/forum/steroids-qa/pct-anti-estrogens/how-much-ari...
https://www.eroids.com/forum/steroids-qa/steroid-cycles/give-advice-on-f...
Age: 30
Height: 6ft 2
Weight: 214
BF:
stas? cycle history? goals?
RustyhookerStats?
lol beat me by seconds hahahah
Harder shut down and greater chances for necer recovering. The results after 10-12 weeks slow down so the negative side of such cycle outweights the possible gains. Such a long cycles are more apropriate for meds that kick in late such as EQ or HGH.
Oh ok so the test is less effective after 13 weeks or so good to know thanks for the knowledge bro
Going off what the guys have said think of it this way. Remember when you were studying for finals and your pulling all nighters just running off caffeine... After a while you just aren't being productive. Even though you feel like you have the energy. And then when you stop, your crash will be even greater. What I have learned from the guys on here is that AAS is a tool. You can have all the gas in the world, but no motor and your going nowhere.... Just my 2cents.