WhyNot's picture
WhyNot
  • 92
  • CC
5712

+ 7 Beginner’s Guide to Your First 4 AAS Cycles

ad

So you decided to take the plunge and do your first AAS cycle or you’ve done one or two and are wondering what your next one should be. Read this whole post and the links on my opinion on the subject matter.

First thing you need to understand right off the bat. Is that it’s all about the diet, as a matter of fact I would say 70% or better, your results will be dependent on your diet. You can either take my word on this and save yourself a ton of grief, or learn the hard way.

So let’s begin with a timeline.

1. Get blood work done and get a physical to make sure that you are healthy enough. Not even up for discussion. DO NOT SKIP THIS

Read one of my other posts, titled Bloodwork - What to Get and When - MUST READ (<==click the blue text) for an overview.

2. Get all of your PCT gear. It will consist of Nolvadex AND Clomid.

3. Get your syringes. My recommendation is 18 gauge 1.5” for drawing compounds and 27 gauge 1.25” for intramuscular injections. You will also need .5” 29 gauge (or higher) insulin syringes for your hCG (if you go the sub-q route).

I recommend you read my other post, titled Where to PIN and Avoiding Major Nerves. (<==click the blue text) You will find a lot of very useful information that will help you get started and keep you safe (mostly).

4. Get your AI. I would recommend starting with Anastrozole (“Adex”) it is cheaper and easier to dose (for a beginner). Some people will have issues with lipids on Adex so I recommend seeing if that’s the case for you or not (via blood work at week 6). If it is, your next go around can be Exemestane (more expensive and needs to be dosed more frequently).

5. Get your HCG (10,000IU is more than enough).

6. Get your AAS. In this case Testosterone Cypionate OR Enanthate AND Testosterone Propionate AND Proviron . I would not recommend getting concentrations of higher than 250 mg/ml for Cypionate, 300 mg/ml for Enanthate and 150 mg/ml for Propionate. Any higher than these recommendations can be crippling for some individuals in terms of PIP and there is simply no need for them for the purposes of this post.

So you got all of this and you’re ready to go. So here’s what you should be running for your first four cycles (my opinion). You don’t really need anything else. As a matter of fact unless your going to be competing on a national level this simple cycle will be more than enough to exceed most individuals lifetime physical development goals.

Start With Blood Work as a Reference.

Weeks 1-12….…500 mg of Testosterone Enanthate, biweekly injections (250mgx2).

Weeks 1-2………Testosterone Propionate 100mg EOD (every other day).

Weeks 2-4………Testosterone Propionate 50mg EOD (every other day).

Weeks 1-12……..50mg Proviron ED (every day).

Weeks 1-12……..Adex at .5mg day of Injection (unless you know your dose). So twice a week you dose for a total of 1mg per week. Adjust this dosage based on the results you get in your bloodwork at week 6 (you want your E2 somewhere around 35).

Weeks 1-13.5………hCG at 150 IU 3 times a week right up until 4 days before PCT. HCG can be administered both sub-q and intramuscular. Sub-q will cause less trauma to the body.

Week 6………Get blood work done to verify your AI dosage as well as your overall health.

Week 14………Start PCT (if you are using Enanthate, if you are using Cypionate wait an additional 4 days).

PCT (the numbers below represent daily dosages and are separated by weeks, so that’s 4 weeks of Clomid and 5 weeks of Nolvadex).

Clomid………100/50/50/50
Nolvadex……40/20/20/20/10

8 weeks AFTER PCT check your levels with blood work to make sure you recovered by comparing them to your pre-cycle bloodwork.

Some basic questions and answers.

Q. Why incorporate Proviron?

A. So that you can do more with less. Proviron will help suppress SHBG which will in turn give you more “free testosterone”, and that’s what counts. Plus it has some additional benefits to the user which are outside the scope of this post.

Q. Why not just run a straight Test E or C cycle for a beginner, why are you incorporating a Test P kicker?

A. There are a lot of reasons behind my thought process. The most prominent being is that it will unable the user to achieve higher peak plasma blood levels quicker to make it a much more productive 12 week cycle. Let’s face it the first one is always the best, might as well make the most out of it with the least amount possible.

Q. Should I run an AI from the beginning?

A. Yes, your body will start to convert testosterone into estrogen from the very first injection.

Q. Do I need to incorporate hCG throughout my cycle?

A. Yes you do. HCG mimics LH in the body. Without it the testes shut down. The longer they remain shut down the more difficult it is to restart them. This will ensure a greater chance of recovery during your PCT and after. If you maintain your testes function throughout the cycle then the only thing you really have to worry about is getting your hypothalamus and pituitary on board. Also we have LH receptors throughout the body not just in the testes and it is important that those receive stimulation as well for the overall well-being of the user.

Q. You say “this will ensure a greater chance of recovery”, what do you mean, do you mean I may not recover?

A. Any time you mess with your own bodies hormone profiles you stand a chance of NEVER recovering. Wrap your mind around this before you ever start.

Q. So how much can I expect to gain from this cycle?

A. This brings us full circle. It’s all going to depend on your diet. I kid you not, at least 70% of your success is going to be dependent on your diet.

The above are my opinions and not recommendations or an act of condoning. Hopefully the community finds my opinions helpful.

And remember NEVER JUST TAKE ONE OPINION ALWAYS READ RESEARCH ON YOUR OWN.

Remember if you ask me a question the answer is always WhyNot. Smile

gambit's picture

yeah im not sure i like this.

i feel first cycle should be least amounts of pins as possible. people seem to be afraid of the needle when starting. also lets not get them into complicated EOD, or pulling from multiple vials. forget kickstarts, orals, etc and just get use to pinning, cycling, eating, training, resting, dealing with issues that pop up and proper pct.

needs to be reworked, but i can see what u were trying to do.

also, people that need trt may also be living in the lower range of estro. i know i was. so i will agree get base blood work, then u really should another 4-6 weeks into cycle.

WhyNot's picture

I respect your opinion but this is how I look at it.

I think the first few cycles should be testosterone only to allow the user to figure out how that particular compound works in their body and their particular body chemistry.

Prov will allow them to do a lot more with a smaller dosage along with other benefits that we know is associated with the compound.

The kicker makes this a lot more efficient of a cycle then if the same cycle was run without it.

Having said all of this I think that if this is too complicated for someone to follow then probably they should not be touching AAS. Maybe I just give people to much credit, but in my opinion any average person should be able to follow these instructions.

These recommendations are for individuals who are 26 years of age or older, the same people we license to drive an automobile and allow them to do a whole slew of other things in society that are way more complicated and on certain occasions more dangerous.

WhyNot's picture

Although you need Estrogen to make gains too much is very bad for you as a male (so is too little). I would say 80+ percent of TRT patients need AI intervention to manage their E2 what do you think is going to happen at a dose of five times that of TRT?

My point is that if you are taking a properly dosed product, that specs out correctly 500 mg will raise E2 in 99% of the individuals taking testosterone. Also remember that a lot of the people that do their first couple of cycles have elevated body fat and that only exacerbates the problem.

WhyNot's picture

I worked with a lot of people over the years that say the same exact thing as you, but you have to understand that estrogen is like heart disease also known as the silent killer you really can't tell when it's elevated until you already have a problem. That's why bloodwork is so paramount.

Just because you're not getting visual side effects does not mean your estrogen is not elevated and by the time you get some of the more severe ones like GYNO it's already out of control.

Not to mention the key to dealing with 19-nor compounds is being able to successfully manage your Estrogen, because were estrogen goes prolactin and progesterone usually follow.

Look, I advocate blood work because that is really the only way to tell. So if you take your six-week bloodwork on 500 mg a week of testosterone and it shows that your estrogen is in the normal range I would be the first one to recommend dropping an AI. But having a test level of 3000 or better and having normal E2 levels just doesn't happen unless you intervene.

VIKING EVOLUTION's picture

Whynot....... just wondering here are you based US or UK ???

WhyNot's picture

PM sent.

WhyNot's picture

This is something that you and I have disagreed on in the past.

HCG has been utilized in the fertility community (at very high dosages I might) and TRT community with long-term therapy let alone 12 weeks without any of that happening.

Here is a link to a study "The effects of long-term (14-120 months) hCG-treatment of 17 male patients affected by isolated hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (IHH) on testicular volume, plasma testosterone levels, and sperm concentration were assessed." showing that long-term hCG treatment is utilized in the medical community without issue.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1516981

Although you need Estrogen to make gains too much is very bad for you as a male (so is too little). I would say 80+ percent of TRT patients need AI intervention to manage their E2 what do you think is going to happen at a dose of five times that of TRT?

I'll be writing a post soon on all of this backing it up with scientific research. Stay tuned. Smile

WhyNot's picture

Fair enough. Give me a little bit of time I am putting together a few posts that are all tied together. Look forward to hearing your comments.

Pale's picture

One disagreement I would have is recommending the 18gauge for drawing. I have found they beat up the tops something fierce and carry a much higher risk of breaking off a chunk of topper. Of course that has potential for all sorts of trouble. I personally use a 22g for drawing. Good write up tho +1

WhyNot's picture

I think you have a valid point although I've personally never seen it happen. 22gauge is fine as well. I like 18 because it's 1 2 3 and its in.

And thank you for the acknowledgment.

vhman's picture

I've had it happen a few times, so I switched to a 22. I do use a 18 g when I'm pulling the last little bit out of the bottle.

Great post as always.

vhman's picture

X2. Very true about larger gauges trashing the top of your bottles. Injecting rubber pieces into your body is a recipe for disaster.

TheFlash85's picture

I have to disagree on some of this mate, to much for a first cycle, I wouldn't incorporate the test prop, and also 500 is ok, but 350 would be fine, I think by adding the prop first cycle it complicates things a bit for a first timer, and also block a few future steps, as in first cycle- test e or c only- 2nd cycle could incorporate the prop because its still test only (kicker) then 3rd cycle?? it will make them want to advance in compounds sooner in my opinion.

In a promo × 1
WhyNot's picture

I agree that if someone was using pharmaceutical grade 350 mg would more than suffice. But since this is probably going to be run on UGL I will stand by what I wrote.

As far as your other comments I've addressed them in some of the comments below since they were similar in nature.

Thank you for your input.

TheFlash85's picture

don't get me wrong mate, just varying opinion, ive had ugl mass spec at over 92. test prop is better than harsh orals that's for sure, but is it better than crippiling pip on virgin muscles??? that would be my concern, id be inclined to stick with advising just long esters first run. cheers

In a promo × 1
WhyNot's picture

I don't doubt you get good UGL but there's also a lot of it under dosed. That is why I made the pharmaceutical comment.

I think there are a lot of people including yourself who have put up valid concerns. I personally thought about these in the past as well. Maybe I am too optimistic but I think most grown men would be able to follow this protocol and deal with the PIP (remember your mixing the P with E so it will tame it somewhat).

TheFlash85's picture

no worries, I will still be advising against it, ill be sticking to the rite way, im not changing cycle advice just because you typed it. no offence

In a promo × 1
WhyNot's picture

There is more then one right way to do this........and you're entitled to your opinions.

TheFlash85's picture

true bro, but there is a ton of stickys and posts that this now contravenes, I can see more and more disasters in cycle section now, people will be confused on what to run first cycle, your info is great, a lot of top quality info, I can just see new guys getting more confused now, it will be something like I read this and it says to do a prop kicker, but I read that and it says no, im still new here myself, maybe been here a year, but for guy that have been here 2-3 years that have spent all that time teaching something, this just chucks it out the window. +1 for the other good info.

In a promo × 1
Catalyst's picture

I like the approach, but I don't agree with bringing short esters into play for a few cycles personally, purely on the basis of frequency of pinning.

Good write up though, I like your logical systematic approach. +2

WhyNot's picture

Thank you for the acknowledgment. I addressed the short easters on the comment below.

I may also have taken things for granted since I work with a lot of athletes and supervisor protocols that it's never been an issue in the past. Maybe unsupervised it might be a problem. That was just my judgment call.

WhyNot's picture

Double post. Sorry.

HllwdBdBoy's picture

Site rotation and training sites are vastly under emphasized around here +3

Catalyst's picture

Just easier to get right with long esters for 3 or 4 cycles. If it goes wrong on longs, plenty of other spots to use. They rapidly run out on shorts, no matter how much experience you've got!

WhyNot's picture

Thank You.

Makwa's picture

Nice layout and straightforward for a beginner to follow. Maybe a little much for a beginner as far as EOD pinning with the prop though. What would your thoughts be on frontloading the test e to avoid the frequent pinning for their first cycle? Prop could be saved for another cycle when they have their site rotation mastered, but if they are not put off by the frequent pinning right away I see no problem with it.
+1

WhyNot's picture

Thank you for the acknowledgment.

I don't think frontloading will be as effective as a kicker that I outlined. It's a 12 week cycle and I'm trying to get the most out of it for the user, that's my thought process for a beginner cycle.

I thought about the point that you made about EOD, and why I decided to keep it in their. It's for only four weeks and it will give just enough of an exposure to an EOD protocol to let them judge on there the more advanced cycles (say after the sixth cycle) if they should pick short acting compounds. Its hands on experience that will be very valuable as they mature in their knowledge and venture forth.

That's my two cents.