This analysis and summary tells us nothing brother. Only thing jumps out to me is that the sample did not match what it was compared to in molecular weight.
I miss the days when we got beakers personal evaluation summary.
Doss, I miss your old name. Regardless, the dr and I have had some very lengthy discussion over this particular sample. I can post it if you like but fanboys from all kinds of different sources have silenced beaker and I. it has come to the point where I just post the results, no interpretation. I'm gonna let Interpretation up to people that think they're much smarter than me. I just run tests and give results.
Please give us you're interpretation. I'm sick of arguing with people who have no where near the knowledge it takes to understand this including myself. This requires a phd in biochemistry not a phd in bioscience.
Well I'm fucking clueless to this stuff and I know I speak for most of the eroids community when I say fuck the fanboys please interpret! I would appreciate the shit out of it. And I got 90 ius of this sources jins if u want to test them? Pm if you would be interested. Thank you for what you do.
Does it really matter buddy? 3.33mgs of rhGH 191=10ius-apprx. (2.71ius = 1mg) This sample vial contains .3mgs (1iu) of a protein that has a different molecular mass of 191aa. Unless that's some sort of "typo" (entire vial contents)
always so thorough. My brain just melted. So, yea, we use 3iu as an approximate. 2.7iu for prescription. Or an example. I've got a HYGENE BioPharm 8iu kit. 3.2mg (8iu) 2.5 (2.7) X 3.2 ? So, yea, 3iu
Cool brotha yeah it's a little overwhelming but I guess bottom line is the results are still not good either way if they are indeed testing a full vial it'd be nice if Angus could tell us of that was indeed the case...I saw a similar number from another vial he tested another vial came back at like .3mg of protein present only thing is I think that vial was suppose to contain 20iu oh well I'm just curious if that.3mg of protein is totally protein for one vial meaning it's about 3mg short or if only a fraction of the vial say 1/10 was used thus making .3mg 1/10 of the 3.33 that should be in there...so I guess my question to Angus would be did you use a full vial and if so should a full vial say contains 3.33mg of protein and not .3 I recall on the other test some explanation why it was soo low but Idk if that was true or just poppycock ...almost wrote poopycock gosh I'm tired
I was looking at another hgh mass spec a few days ago and it said the sample contains someting like .5mg of protein,and it said "more then 100 times over what it should contain" someting along those lines anyways but insinuating that it's someting that should not be the sample. I'm trying to remember where I read it.
That's interesting... so you don't remember where the sample results were posted? I take it not on Eroids at least?yeah something is weird about that protein number I've seen on most test results now I'll have to reasearch it or ask my rep from my pharma supplier if he knows
1/10 is what I was thinking also. But it's not stated that way. It doesn't matter. Maybe the results I get back will help for both tests. Knowing the M/W is good. But endotoxins present and bioavailability (amino sequence) is also a plus. Injecting 2ius of the correct protein (M/W) and correct sequence (identical to one's own GH) isn't the same as injecting 10ius of a similar protein (M/W) that's "almost" identical to one's own GH.
Don't cha think.
An accurate interpretation would be sweet. I'm prolly one of "those guys" that thinks he knows when the truth is I know fukall. I'm still trying to figure out if Isotope 26 is legit. That should tell ya sumpthin.
lol. Beaker and Angus are the middle men. They take the money and send sample to a lab. They are not the same person. The guy that does the test will be referred to as "The good Doctor" .
You guys make me laugh. Beaker and I do these.....well .....kinda. They do have his name on them because they started out that way. We decided to change the name to "report" instead of beaker but somehow that got forgotten over my break. Bottom line is this guy did run these labs and these are the honest results. In fact I have another user that sent in a sample of the same thing. I'm gonna have it run just like anything else. No two results are ever the same so this should be interesting. But u guys that think everything is a farce amuses me.
But u guys that think everything is a farce amuses me.
Not really sure what you're trying say here.. I do realize that these are the results of the test he had done. All I'm saying is that posting a series of jumbled up numbers and letters in a graph and summary format with a product name doesn't mean it's a good product.
My knowledge on these sorts of tests is far below yours or beakers. I def appreciate have guys like you around to do these sorts of testing, and I def appreciate the src posting them. From where I'm standing, tho, the product isn't what it's supposed to be.
You guys all talk about pharma growth and wanting to know what you're putting in your body but you inject yourself with gear made in some dudes basement on a fucking hotplate. seems legit. I understand wanting to get real gh when your fork over your hard earned money instead of getting fake shit but dont talk about quality control and sterility when you buy bathtub brew gear.
And I'm not a supporter of ugl growth, frankly I'm sick of it and getting burned. But I atleast try to spend a little more when I can to buy the gear made by one of the huge international labs in a real facility in a country thats alowed to produce it with automated production lines and more quality control then any of these bathtub brewers basements have. Just seems ironic to me.
Ya, fda liscense, produced in a 25 million dollar facility. Sure its not USA fda gear but it sure as hell beats stuff made in some dudes dusty basement or garage.
There is a few ugls that I would rather run than foreign pharma grade. I Think of some guys with their ball sacks in the oil saying stupid Americans when it comes to foreign oil.
lol youre crazy bro. I would rather run gear made in a multi million dollar facility with automated production lines and constant testing done then any of the thousand domestic ugls made in some dudes basement with a beaker and a hot plate. Just my opinion tho. I care about my body so I'm willing to pay a little more instead of find the cheapest deal arojnd an I like to fuel my body with high grade fuel rather then low grade dirty shit.
Get a script then....Moldova.....hmmm......organized crime....lots of counterfeits...maybe I'm thinkn of a different Moldova. Or maybe doing some research here, might be some "diamond in the rough" UGL's. IRON-ic?
swoller87Fuckin jins are a joke got the balls to try5ius and what do u know red welp and sore as shit. If anybody wants a free 90ius of dog shit let me know.
This analysis and summary tells us nothing brother. Only thing jumps out to me is that the sample did not match what it was compared to in molecular weight.
I miss the days when we got beakers personal evaluation summary.
Exactly all it tells us is the molecular weight ls are different.
angusDoss, I miss your old name. Regardless, the dr and I have had some very lengthy discussion over this particular sample. I can post it if you like but fanboys from all kinds of different sources have silenced beaker and I. it has come to the point where I just post the results, no interpretation. I'm gonna let Interpretation up to people that think they're much smarter than me. I just run tests and give results.
I hate fanboys and I miss you
Please give us you're interpretation. I'm sick of arguing with people who have no where near the knowledge it takes to understand this including myself. This requires a phd in biochemistry not a phd in bioscience.
angusBro, I keep trying to post this stuff but the cloudflare is stopping me. Lemme see if I can PM you.
LennyJust ask him if he would run "generic" HGH. I bet I can guess his answer.
angusI would not, no.
swoller87Well I'm fucking clueless to this stuff and I know I speak for most of the eroids community when I say fuck the fanboys please interpret! I would appreciate the shit out of it. And I got 90 ius of this sources jins if u want to test them? Pm if you would be interested. Thank you for what you do.
AnonWhen u gonna post this?
Does it really matter buddy? 3.33mgs of rhGH 191=10ius-apprx. (2.71ius = 1mg) This sample vial contains .3mgs (1iu) of a protein that has a different molecular mass of 191aa. Unless that's some sort of "typo" (entire vial contents)
Wait what? Where'd you get 2.71ius = 1mg?!?!?
45iu = 15mg (big pens)
36iu = 12mg (pharma catridge)
30iu = 10mg (medium pen)
15iu = 5mg (small pen)
10iu = 3.33mg «{Approx}» (average pharma vial)
Therefore 1mg = 3iu? Or 2.71iu = .903mg «{Approx}»
Therefore .3mg ((vials protein) considering they used a whole vial to test) =.9iu «{Approx}»
Am I right? Your math was off right?
Still not good for the results lol and I'm not trying to pick and I also maybe the one who did his math wrong but I'm just checking
Cool brotha yeah it's a little overwhelming but I guess bottom line is the results are still not good either way if they are indeed testing a full vial it'd be nice if Angus could tell us of that was indeed the case...I saw a similar number from another vial he tested another vial came back at like .3mg of protein present only thing is I think that vial was suppose to contain 20iu oh well I'm just curious if that.3mg of protein is totally protein for one vial meaning it's about 3mg short or if only a fraction of the vial say 1/10 was used thus making .3mg 1/10 of the 3.33 that should be in there...so I guess my question to Angus would be did you use a full vial and if so should a full vial say contains 3.33mg of protein and not .3 I recall on the other test some explanation why it was soo low but Idk if that was true or just poppycock ...almost wrote poopycock gosh I'm tired
I was looking at another hgh mass spec a few days ago and it said the sample contains someting like .5mg of protein,and it said "more then 100 times over what it should contain" someting along those lines anyways but insinuating that it's someting that should not be the sample. I'm trying to remember where I read it.
That's interesting... so you don't remember where the sample results were posted? I take it not on Eroids at least?yeah something is weird about that protein number I've seen on most test results now I'll have to reasearch it or ask my rep from my pharma supplier if he knows
1/10 is what I was thinking also. But it's not stated that way. It doesn't matter. Maybe the results I get back will help for both tests. Knowing the M/W is good. But endotoxins present and bioavailability (amino sequence) is also a plus. Injecting 2ius of the correct protein (M/W) and correct sequence (identical to one's own GH) isn't the same as injecting 10ius of a similar protein (M/W) that's "almost" identical to one's own GH.
And it is just that simple...
An old man....turned 98.....he won the Lottery.....died the next....isn't it IronIC....don't ya think....a little too..... :))
thats not an example of irony. Just a shitty coincidence and shitty written lyrics.
angusIronic
Don't cha think.
An accurate interpretation would be sweet. I'm prolly one of "those guys" that thinks he knows when the truth is I know fukall. I'm still trying to figure out if Isotope 26 is legit. That should tell ya sumpthin.
StevebWhere is Beaker?
angusI'm your huckleberry
StevebCan you run a test to tell why Ace is so gay?
angusTest came back positive.......hes pregnant.
StevebDamn, I got to lay low for 18 years.
Not sure. But his name is on one of these reports. This lab is sketchy IMO. I would be wary until something more definitive is posted.
AnonIt is rather sketchy, beaker=angus.
Lennylol. Beaker and Angus are the middle men. They take the money and send sample to a lab. They are not the same person. The guy that does the test will be referred to as "The good Doctor" .
AnonNothing against angus nor beaker but it was just a thought. Lol
angusYou guys make me laugh. Beaker and I do these.....well .....kinda. They do have his name on them because they started out that way. We decided to change the name to "report" instead of beaker but somehow that got forgotten over my break. Bottom line is this guy did run these labs and these are the honest results. In fact I have another user that sent in a sample of the same thing. I'm gonna have it run just like anything else. No two results are ever the same so this should be interesting. But u guys that think everything is a farce amuses me.
Not really sure what you're trying say here.. I do realize that these are the results of the test he had done. All I'm saying is that posting a series of jumbled up numbers and letters in a graph and summary format with a product name doesn't mean it's a good product.
My knowledge on these sorts of tests is far below yours or beakers. I def appreciate have guys like you around to do these sorts of testing, and I def appreciate the src posting them. From where I'm standing, tho, the product isn't what it's supposed to be.
angusSorry, I misunderstood.
LennyThis is still simple. It is shit. Does not matter what MS says.
bigwillyjust change them to yellow tops and lets start over !!
You guys all talk about pharma growth and wanting to know what you're putting in your body but you inject yourself with gear made in some dudes basement on a fucking hotplate. seems legit. I understand wanting to get real gh when your fork over your hard earned money instead of getting fake shit but dont talk about quality control and sterility when you buy bathtub brew gear.
And I'm not a supporter of ugl growth, frankly I'm sick of it and getting burned. But I atleast try to spend a little more when I can to buy the gear made by one of the huge international labs in a real facility in a country thats alowed to produce it with automated production lines and more quality control then any of these bathtub brewers basements have. Just seems ironic to me.
That's just crazy talk! It's not quality ugl if there isn't a rogue pube here and there.
And sperm in your Winstrol.
hahahahah
Isn't it ironic......don't ya think....a litlle too.....ironic
Just a little.
StevebJust like I try to buy milk and meat without added hormones but I inject myself with hormones.
Eastern Europe? Moldova?
Ya, fda liscense, produced in a 25 million dollar facility. Sure its not USA fda gear but it sure as hell beats stuff made in some dudes dusty basement or garage.
LennyThere is a few ugls that I would rather run than foreign pharma grade. I Think of some guys with their ball sacks in the oil saying stupid Americans when it comes to foreign oil.
lol youre crazy bro. I would rather run gear made in a multi million dollar facility with automated production lines and constant testing done then any of the thousand domestic ugls made in some dudes basement with a beaker and a hot plate. Just my opinion tho. I care about my body so I'm willing to pay a little more instead of find the cheapest deal arojnd an I like to fuel my body with high grade fuel rather then low grade dirty shit.
Get a script then....Moldova.....hmmm......organized crime....lots of counterfeits...maybe I'm thinkn of a different Moldova. Or maybe doing some research here, might be some "diamond in the rough" UGL's. IRON-ic?
LennyI'm with you. Pretty sure the scammers from Moldova could give a shit less about our heath.