posted Fri, 08/29/2014 - 05:33
3633
+ 17 Legend Pharma (Powersteroid) Tren Ace Mass Spec Results
ad
Here are the long awaited results for Anton's Tren A. Sorry for the way it's uploaded as I had difficulties even getting it up to this point. Don't blame me I'm old.
The sample was sent in after it was purchased without the knowledge of the supplier that it was getting tested until after it was received.
I'll let the community asses this one.
Ordered from:
- Bookmark
- 18
- 1
thanks for the labs +2
Anyword on if this test is reliable? Its like the guy fucked up or something.
Loose_CannonIt's not reliable at all, a lot of red flags were raised about the mass specs a couple months ago that's why you don't see many mass specs anymore I appreciate guitar player wanting to help this community but I along with numerous other members and sources find these mass specs unreliable
I sent a pm his way to ask about his exp on the ace and he told me that he the test purity is consistint with his results.
What! 82% nice dose 250mg/ml that's some heavy stuff for ace. Is it supposed to be dosed that high?
Supposed to be 100mg/ml
This is a great report. I will be placing an order shrotly now.
+1 for posting bro!
For the price we are getting it for you really can't complain. Thanks for taking the time to educate power's customers +2
+1 big Dog! Thanks for posting
the neg was uncalled for +1, and it looks like the deca was absent in the rip rip sample lol .
+1 for uploading this mass mate. Not sure why someone negged you for posting exactly what you received.
Seems like posting lab results comes with drama lately.
+1 for taking your time hope they fix the test for u sir
Thank you Bulldog. I ran the Tren A and it was good stuff
MeinuntergangLooks stupid and unprofessional.
Deca is absent so tren a at 250 mg/ml.... Really? Who composed this test? Sarah Palin's autistic child? -1
Would you be happy if he didn't post the results for us and contacted the source for a freebie instead of sharing with the community? He put the test out there without hesitation, maybe next time you can concentrate on reading the whole thing and putting the obvious pieces of the puzzle together. And if you can't do that then maybe you can hold back and grow up before you neg someone for posting a mass spec...I'm sure my karma will drop now, you're clearly upset
Apparently you havent been following along with all of the questions raised about the legitmacy of mass specs lately. When mass spec results, in particular the purity percentage, are being called into question. You would have to be insane not to question something like this. Do you just take random screen shots at face value? I personally dont. And to call out a members integrity as far as negging you before it even happens is a little uncalled for. Granted i wouldnt personally neg these test results, but i also dont disagree with another bro negging them.
Just for starters the first thing I do when I log on is go to lab tests to see what's up. Secondly, I'm WELL AWARE of the mass spec controversy so if you looked at any of my posts you would know I definitely follow them. My issue was with a member getting negged for posting a test. Would you of rather him kept the results to himself and harassed the source for free gear because it wasn't 99.9% pure like every other HPLC test that gets posted. Errors happen here and there, anybody that read the full post the OP stated would know it wasn't deca that got sent in. And if you dont disagree with somebody else negging it why would it be something you wouldn't do personally? You're just proving my point by saying that. The OP did a blind test and didn't blackmail or suck off a source like another 100 members do every day. You gotta relax man...pretty soon you'll be changing that name from readytokillit to gonnakilleveryone! Deep breaths now, I just disagree with somebody putting a test out to BETTER OUR COMMUNITY and getting negged for it. Peace bro
I would rather him kept the results to himself if: A. There are glaring mistakes that will just lead to confusion amd arguement (which there are) B. If it does not match to a tee the other mass specs we are used to seeing (it does not) And C. If angus is not going to come in and verify he did the test (he has not). As i said before i dont trust random screen shots. This could be photo shopped for all i know, especially with all of the irregularities. Until those 3 criteria are met, i put no credibility in this test. So this comes back around to why i wouldnt neg but do support someone that does. I am willing to give op a chance to put these questions to bed, but not everyone has to share my view. So if he wants to neg thats his perogative.
A. I did not conduct the test
B. I did not conduct the test
C. I did not conduct the test
See how that works? I got NOTHING to gain by posting these results (besides having a rough idea what I am injecting into my body)
Let me make this clear right now...This test is not "photoshopped" and any member can ask and I will email you the results that are not screenshot. They were screenshot because it was the only way I could figure out how to get them up here on Eroids for YOUR knowledge to what the Tren A purity is.
Fucking ass ache is what this is! You see the results ^^^ up top? That's what I was given period!
Did you read c big guy? Why is the tester not coming in and confirming the validity of the test and clarifying the nature of the mistake? Look bro if we just take shit like this at face value, all of a sudden every goddamn src is gonna come in here with faked results. Am i saying thats what you did? NO! However, im not gonna let any unsavory src get the idea he can come in here with some shenanigans. The ass ache is of your own doing, maybe its because you only half assed this post by putting up shit that is not to community standards when it comes to mass spec testing.
You and I know very well that this test is similar to Angus Mass test. Have not seen him come on here crying that it is not his test.
Again I posted what I was sent and the community can make their own judgement on the way the test was conducted. look at it like this, If a source sent you 10 half empty vials to you, I bet you would post pics to let the community aware, why is this any different.
Don't sweat all this man, this kind of stuff is exactly why angus doesn't come on anymore and explain his tests, its take it or leave it and i don't blame him. He did some tests on a srcs gear, they came back poor and instead of the src attacking the issue at hand which was shitty tren he attacked the testing. it definnetly worked cause you don't often see these tests up anymore. I got a couple done that came back last month but i never posted them cause of this kind of thing. anyway i appreciate you posting.
x2
copy and paste job gone awry, with the amount of mass specs these guys produce ... shit happens. the tests are done under the table it seems ... so give em a little slack brother
So you neg me? LOL I did not conduct the test
MeinuntergangThen you should not have posted it until it's 100% correct. Mass Spec is a last resort. If it's not reliable, then what it?
Really buddy? Shall I wait for the edited version to appease you? This Test is posted exactly how I got it and that's exactly what the community will see, the unedited version. When the edited version is sent, if at all then you can see that one too.
AnonNot trying to sound like a dick but it makes this Src and Angus look pretty bad bro. If that was the goal then consider it accomplished. I believe you that it was a mistake but both Angus and This Src have been questioned in the past. This continues that trend. Just my observation bro. I might have asked Angus what was up before posting this lab result
The only goal here was to see what the potency is in the Vial. I am not here to do anyone any favors as I could care less for bleeding knees and seamen on my chin. If this continues the "trend" of mistakes then so be it.
I have asked Angus what the deal was and the response was " I will have go back to the dr and see what is going on" These test have been waited on for 8 weeks and my patience is wearing thin.
I don't believe this does any harm to the source as it looks like the test were mislabled in the header. 82% purity is a decent # for a UGL.
JuicedAggressionThis seems like a "mistake" questionable of bullshit. 250mg Tren A....not likely and by that I do not mean highly unlikely I mean NOT LIKELY! Then come to find out the tests may have been mislabeled for Deca. I'm Sorry, but I am on this site for knowledge and guidance towards reliable sources and this is bullshit! No offense to the OP unless you are guilty of wrong play or the source which is Chinese "known for wrong play" but for a lab to confuse or a sender of a test to confuse Tren for Deca or whatever the hells going on here........the bottom line is something's messed up. POWER I know you are Chinese and have contacted multiple peeps on this forum to pull for you as you did me which I declined but I did not know it was this serious. Obviously as us vets of steroid use, Carlos Danger you must agree that 250mg Tren Ace is bull and if your test compound was a supposed to be Deca and there was a mistake.....that highly sounds like bull as well.
Just speaking the TRUTH and looking out for OUR community, fellow Eroiders!
I am not getting why the source is involved in this? The source did not send in the samples or was aware until AFTER the purchase.
Also yes Deca (250 mg/ml) was also sent in and those test will be up soon as well. Looks like the header portion of this test was fucked up.
pretty sure he sent this to a different lab for the test...i doubt he sent this back to anton lol...looks like a report from angus?
Correct
Very confusing.
Summary states: Tren ace 250mg/ml ???
The tren ace offered is 100mg/ml
Whats up with that? Not very impressed with this lab report. Deca or Tren A?
Tren A brother.
AnonHow is the pip? Did it ever crash? The test says concentration is 250mg/ml. For Tren A that should kick like a fucking Clydesdale and most likely wouldn't hold without lots of harsher solvents
Again another element to the test that does not make sense. The Tren Is 100mg/ml. The pip was non existent for me. I do know it is suspended in MCT oil which helps with any pip.
Iron_Monk82% pure for $35
...not bad at all...
Thanks for the knowledge homie
i like to see these again. im no scientist but i do believe these tests have value. i don't remember ever seeing a case where good mass specs and good blood work didn't match up, same with bad mass specs and bad blood work, cases of horrible side effects and bad mass specs, etc. they all seemed to match up.
AnonSo was this sample a deca labeled vial or Tren? Or was it supposed to be a blend of both?
It was a sample of Tren that was mislabled on the header sheet on the report i believe
AnonOh ok. I saw it mention Nadrolone wasn't present so I had to ask. Not bad