hunteron20s's picture
hunteron20s
  • 0
1295

+ 1 lab test on blue tops . testing only no purchase .

ad

The bottles i got to test looked shady but the gh results are high. Will see if kigs wants to run igf or not ..

Ordered from: 
gorillafit28's picture

+1 as always thanks for your tests

irongame427's picture

again crazy high numbers that make you scratch your head. thanks for testing

KAM1314's picture

I still dont understand why he is going through all this "new kit" testing. The Angs got sent out to an accredited lab that said the shit was spot on and contains real gh.....why even bother carrying something else in his stock that might go to shit soon. The Angs are very affordable and going great so far, why ruin a good thing? Just send a bottle of Angs from each new batch number to a lab to make sure they're consistently dosed properly without fillers or impurities and continue on

Hamm's's picture

I'm pretty sure money comes into play with the"new kits" More mark up on the "non-angs"??

HailRazor's picture

^^^^ this

irongame427's picture

So true, just make sure each batch of angs is good, send out one vial like you said. Angs are incredibly cheap for the quality. But maybe he can get these color tops and sell them for 140 or something?? idk just a guess. Have a cheaper option available. I know this makes zero sense to me and you because 190 is already beyond dirt cheap for quality gh but there must be some reasonsing behind it.

gorillafit28's picture

Agreed I love the Angs 190 for a kit is dirt cheep a few years ago 250-280 was the going rate for that quality! But I'm sure the generic unlabeled kits r extremely cheep for a src to grab up

KAM1314's picture

I have no clue either. Why even look for a cheaper option when you have a good product and a decent customer base?

purejuiced's picture

Same reason walmart sells coke and pepsi, bud light and coors light. More options means more money. AlsoThere will always be customers that shop for best product and customers that shop for best price.

irongame427's picture

idk, maybe hes not actually looking for a generic color top to sell but seeing which one tests best and then have that maufactuer label it up as some type of tropin and sell it for more, or slighty less? I have no idea but hes a business man so there is definitely some method to the madness. But I agree with you just keeping the tighest quality control on the angtropin would be the very best idea, Do not let the quality slip at all, as most non pharm grade gh does at some point.

Darkhorse777's picture

Which blue tops are these he sent out 2 diff ones a dna top and a labeled one

In a promo × 2
Darkhorse777's picture

I tested those too i got 25 on serum i think they might be really good but he said he cant get more for igf1 test

In a promo × 2
HailRazor's picture

You can run 5IUs for 10days (or even as little as 8 days) then pull IGF1 (without injecting an entire vial before testing)

(If the the vial is reconstituted as 10IUs) 5IUs in 8-10days is plenty of time to reach a stable level. This would eliminate the 4 weeks for IGF1.

Just a suggestion. Smile