+ 9 Exmple of a bad test for Methenolone enanthate
Methenolone enanthate by Stealth Juice that was rejected by us and sent back to manufacturer
BAD BATCH THAT WAS RETURNED TO SUPPLIER BEFORE GETTING TO CUSTOMERS
Here is a batch with bad stealth that we tested before sending to customers and we sent it back to supplier.
I just wanted to post it because of two reasons:
1
as a example to see how a impure oil will be analyzed on HPLC and how results are presented.
Nowhere is wrote purity as a percentage like Angus was doing.
You have as result for test:
each impurity percentage maximum expected (allowed by pharmacopeia) to be in the solution in second column and in third column you have each impurity found for real in solution methenolone concentration mg/ml ( expected in the solution and real found in solution),
2
Second reason that every source understand how important is to test each of your batch. They are making stealth for many years and now was a error somewhere and they destroyed this batch by contamination. They found the problem and will take measures not to repeat again. Raw analyze was perfect so they just contaminated the solution.
- Bookmark
- 9
- 0
Now thats a top notch src!, always looking out for his/her customers..Earned my respect
Wow that is awesome you just got a new customer for sure any one can appreciate that type of customer service thanks!
JuicedAggressionOutstanding honesty and integrity Ashop! Keep up the great work!
AnonI definitely agree with you! Ashop is one of a kind! +1
Thank you for clearing this up and being stand up with your custys!
Thank you ! I am really trying hard not to fuck up and deliver good products and I am happy that people appreciate
Thanks for posting.
rocketballzYou should figure out a way in which the average person can read and understand what you are posting. That's why people like Angus. Because he presents the information in an easy to read and understand way; regardless of what you may think of his testing accuracy. This is just pages and pages of numbers and I doubt anyone on here can understand exactly what this means. Surely there is an easier way.
I am a normal person and I understand completely
JuicedAggressionAll that is in the "red" does not conform with standards. The 111mg/ml does not conform, but I definitely would not complain about that if the sample were not contaminated! However in the section where the solution should be clear, not one area conforms they are all above with a Total that should not be above 2% finishing at 9.258%. So one thing I've noticed about Stealth is their dosing is definitely on point and slightly over on all products, but it is very unfortunate this batch was contaminated during brewing to packing somewhere. It happens. They're a great company so I'm sure they will take appropriate measures to prevent a future contamination in whatever way it happened this time.
Guys who are working there are swearing they done everything good but analyses doesn't lie. I am sure they screwed up by not cleaning properly filling machine. Is very dangerous to have a primobolan with test inside maybe a women use and get mustache.
Also with overdosing : please learn that nobody is making you a good thing if they overdose products. You need correct dose from the label because you need to know next cycle what dosage to you and how long to rest. If someone overdose next cycle a correctly dosed product will not be good for you or you will think is weak. Always content must comply with label, finally you pay for labels also !
JuicedAggressionI agree with you completely my friend but 10mg above labeled dosage would not be too horribly bad correct? That was my thought process because if a purity is around 90% which is a good quality raw then to truly get 100mg per injection on a 100mg injectable you would have to inject 10% more so if the product is made with that in mind and dosed over by 10mg then that would compensate for the purity. This is assuming their products are of good quality raws between 80-95%. That way you are guaranteed to truly get what your paying for. I'm not sure if they hplc Test all of their raws or not but I feel that if they do or assume it is close then the extra few mg's compensate for purity less than 100% which is obviously not going to be the case very rarely if ever.
However, I do agree with what you are saying, that is just the way I was viewing it. A slight bit extra may put you right at 100 true mg per ml in theory.
You are an amazing source Ashop and as I said above your honestly and integrity is simply outstanding in this community.
This isn't very hard to interpret once you have learned the basics of Mass Specs in all its forms. It's really quite simple actually. If you can comprehend what you read, then you can learn in an hour how this works. Anyone who doesn't , I don't believe they earn the right to speak out for or against test results either way. Ignorance is no excuse. But another note, angus didn't just "make it easy" for ppl to read. He MADE UP SHIT! Or he was being guided by someone making up shit. How can you speak on behalf of angus if you don't even unstand this process?
rocketballzSo let me get this straight. I have to learn about mass specs (in all it's forms) before trying to interpret something that is hand written and meant to be scientific? What happened to dumbing it down for the masses? I'm not a scientist and I don't pretend to be. I simply said there has to be an easier way to post this stuff so that NON scientists can read it and understand it. I am in no way backing angus I merely said he put out test results in an easy to read format. I thought he was a respected member in here. Now he's a liar? Man that's disappointing.
I think anyone who know to read can understand the page. You need to look just on the first page. Please take a look on first page and tell me you do not understand or ask me questions
Angus presented lies in a easy to understand way
rocketballzThat's fine. I didn't know all I have to look at is the first page. Putting up 20 more pages im sure makes you feel like you have done the right thing but it's confusing as hell. Thanks for posting. And I don't know angus. The only thing I know is that he put out test results in an easy to read and understand way. As to the accuracy? Well that's for the scientists to debate.
I think he just wants a test that shows what is actually in it. You have supplied the scientific explanation to what was done/found in the testing. +1 for the effort and quality control Ateam killing it
EXACTLY !
Average steroid user should read only the first page. On the 1st page you have all information`s you need to know if have a quality product.
But a SOURCE should post all pages of those analyses to show that behind the first page there is documentation to sustain the results. A page like 1st page is easy to fake for anyone but the rest of them are impossible to fake . If anyone try to fake so much documentation they will be uncovered sooner or later. So I encourage all sources to test their products and post their lab analyses like I do.
AnonThis is why ashop is number one!! Best source all around!