Picture: Big D Test E 300 mass specs

Your Comment

Bigboy4
11
04/12/2014 - 09:51

No it's dosed accurately at 300mg/ml. However it's purity is 71%. Purity and dosage is different

~~skalpa~~
0
04/12/2014 - 08:44

well this explains how i thought i was running 500mg when in reality i was barely past 300mg..... no more ugl hit and miss for me, only pharma grade

Theonslaught
183
04/12/2014 - 06:22

71% IS GOOD? UM NO!

Or am I confused with powder?

below 95% is considered unsafe, so 71% um that is terrible.

~~angus~~
0
Theonslaught
04/16/2014 - 16:47

so 71% um that is terrible

No it's not. Not for a UGL it's not. If you want greater than 95% purity then you need to stick to pharmacy brands only.

dnell1983
22
04/12/2014 - 00:58

I ran his test e last year...it was good for me +1

~~Anon~~
04/10/2014 - 22:49

thanks for testing +1


 Give them a vote if you find it helpful.

~~BillLumbergh~~
0
04/09/2014 - 19:25

+1 thanks for the test. When did you get this test E?

iintensity
4
BillLumbergh
04/10/2014 - 22:01

What month was the test e you had tested from? It appeared to be quarter dosed.

~~BillLumbergh~~
0
iintensity
04/10/2014 - 22:34

October. My bloods were about half of what I would expect them to be for how much I was injecting and for how long.

99transam
122
BillLumbergh
04/09/2014 - 19:42

January promo...later in the month

1.9k

Pale
1.9k
04/09/2014 - 15:33

Thanks for testing bro +2

~~Anon~~
04/09/2014 - 11:19

Not bad at all
Id run that

markymark
106
04/09/2014 - 06:03

+1 for posting.....im going to order more soon!!

~~hunteron20s~~
0
04/09/2014 - 01:47

It is 213 mg on the button .300x.71%= 213

2500hd
111
04/09/2014 - 00:57

+1 for the testing

cgi
22
04/09/2014 - 00:47

Doesn't that mean you're getting like 220mg per ml of test e and not 300mg?

killroy
205
04/09/2014 - 00:27

Kids on here are too fucking spoiled ... 71% is damn good for UGL ... Remember folks this is a user who sent in his purchased product for testing not the source! Marinate on that for a minute. I'm not making any accusations but business is business, sources can pick and chose results to post , angus won't go rogue and post it without their consent. A end user on the other hand can post test results without a source preventing it.

Owes a Review × 1

~~angus~~
0
killroy
04/09/2014 - 17:58

angus won't go rogue and post it without their consent.

Correct. And to elaborate on that there is a confidentiality agreement between the testee and the tester. We never know if a source is testing to find a new source or testing the source they have so to post their stuff would undermine whatever they are trying to do. If enough people complain it is almost guaranteed that a user (such as the OP) will send in a sample to be tested. And then it is up to that user to determine the best path forward with their results. On this sample I had no clue who the source was. I told him I didn't want to know. I find it better that way.

99transam
122
04/09/2014 - 00:05

I should've pointed out that this was from his january promo...

SwaySway
42
04/08/2014 - 23:33

TimberDog
95
04/08/2014 - 22:56

Thanks for posting this, TA! +1

whitechocolate
202
04/08/2014 - 22:38

I suppose.. +1

TT
0
04/08/2014 - 22:33

Who else you got lined up ?

99transam
122
TT
04/08/2014 - 22:51

Yokes var....elites var...elites npp100...

~~Loose_Cannon~~
0
99transam
04/08/2014 - 23:45

Oh man can't wait to see these results.

TT
0
99transam
04/08/2014 - 23:13

Can't wait to see

1.1k

~~Ace Ventura~~
1.1k
04/08/2014 - 22:30

Oh my. Not bad but not as good as I'd expect from the Big man. +2 thanks for testing!!!

~~Anon~~
Ace Ventura
04/08/2014 - 22:52

That's actually pretty good. Most powders test lower. We tend to over dose just to make sure you all get your money's worth

~~angus~~
0
04/09/2014 - 17:54

This sample was dosed accurately. We have found that 71% is not bad at all. The majority of UGL's that don't know what their purity is run around 50%.

ref
28
04/08/2014 - 23:19

So you overdose your products. DUH Thanks that's real professional . Dip shit

~~Anon~~
ref
04/09/2014 - 17:51

It is quite common to overdose gear. By adding a little extra it compensates for lees potency. By over dosing it it will make it closer to an accurate dose if the purity is less.

KAM1314
146
04/09/2014 - 23:54

You're 100% correct in that. My only issue with that is the fact that not all sources get their raws tested. What if a source actually came across accurately dosed raws this time around? We had some very good mass specs on orals (anavar in particular). For example...if a source is used to getting his raws at about 60% purity and he overdoses 40% to compensate, what happens when his suppliers send him accurately dosed product. If my wife started her first cycle of lady var or a low dose of prop she would be in for a world of hurt because she is going by how something is labeled. I'd be much happier with a product that's slightly under dosed than total over kill. Just my honest opinion. THIS POST HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS SOURCE IN QUESTION, BIG D IS A STAND UP SOURCE AND KK9111 I PERSONALLY LOOK AT YOUR POSTS FOR TIPS AND ADVICE...PLEASE NOBODY GET OFFENDED. I dont worry as much about myself but my wife is looking into her first lady cycle and if she had a bad reaction to a compound I would hate to be the one that told her she is taking way more then she planned for. Again not ripping on anyone here, just the thought of purposely overdosing product worries me a bit